My Game

First. Thankyou for your post. I think that I should have moved the knight to b5 with the idea of getting it to d4. I do think, however, that the rook move to c1 would be wrong because it would lose me a pawn. A possible variations or two could be:
13. Rc1? Bxc3 14. Bxc3 Qxa2
or
13. Rc1? Bxc3 14. Rxc3 Qxa2
But I guess that these variations would leave us with an equal game or something close to equal since I gained a pawn during the opening.


Yes. Thankyou for that post Munchies. I realize now that I did give the initiative to a higher rated player although I had a material advantage of a pawn. I did not expect him to cede me a pawn but instead thought it would be played like the Marshall Defense in the Queens Gambit that we transposed into. I thought that the variation to be played would be:
3.cxd5 Nxd5 4. e4
Where black would be forced to move his knight again giving me the initiative and good central conrol. But you have enlightened me that he purposely gave up a pawn to gain the initiative. I was wondering why such high rated player would purposely give up a pawn. Now I've learned. Thankyou for your post.
The big thing I see in this game is you didn't come out on top with exchanges. 18. b5 was a good move, it forces you to give up either the bishop or the rook. Then, after 32. Re1, black is very willing to trade down rooks, leaving white with very uncoordinated material. However, black was a strong opponent, and these attacks were well planned. Nicely played ayjaraki
Hello chess.com community. I was just wondering if you guys could help me figure out where I went wrong in a game I played against someone during LiveChess. Any constructive comments will be greatly appreciated. Thankyou.