14486 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This game was played in 1858 at the interlude of Night at the Opera, as the great Paul Morphy was invited to Paris' Opera by two quite strong chess afficionados; Duke Karl of Brunswick and Count Isouard who consulted together but couldn't hold their ground more than 16 moves. The game is one of chess history's most famous ones, but rarely found in any "best of chess" books because of the noble pair's less than Grandmaster standard of play. From a Philidor's defence situation, Morphy sac's all his pieces mating with the last remaining two. Enjoy
Comments are appreciated
Morphy, not Murphy.
I stand corrected :)
you did not say that morphy didnt play Qxb7 because of Qb4+
Yeah, sorry. It's the first time I've tried inserting a chess game and the first try went bonkers somehow, so I re-did it by copy-pasting the comments. I think I missed Qb4+ in the first place as well though. Well observed
Omg, I wanted to post this same game but I just did not have time.
The game is one of chess history's most famous one's, but rarely found in any "best of chess" books because of the noble pair's less than Grandmaster standard of play.
Are you kidding? I can think of three books I have within an arm's reach that have extensive annotations of this game. It's usually presented as a "here's what not to do," but it's well represented in print.
Yep, sorry. What I meant to communicate was that the game is not considered among the greatest games in the history of chess because of the lack of high standard play from both sides, and as such not found in books such as "the Mammoth Book of the World's Greatest Chess Games" by Nunn, Emms and Burgess, or other similar ones that concentrate mainly on the afore-mentioned standard. As I mentioned, it is one of the world's most famous games though.
Watch Opera Game film (8 min)
beautiful,what an artist(Morphy)
Genius, sacrificing valuable pieces to divert their important pieces from the action to do a materfully executed checkmate? Well done indeed.
You could put exclamation marks and question marks (for those who don't know: !!=brilliant, !=very strong, !?=interesting, ?!=dubious, ?=mistake, ??=blunder), for example, 9...b5?
If You Could Go to Dinner with Any Chess Player, Who'd You Pick?
by Salem-Saberhagen a few minutes ago
Vintage 1940's English Made Set Possibly Jaques?
by informaticacobach29 a few minutes ago
FIDE vs CHESS. COM rating
by Teichmann70 6 minutes ago
Everyone except akobian sucks
by Teichmann70 7 minutes ago
by kroomania 9 minutes ago
by BISHOP_e3 9 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Connor_Macleod1518 12 minutes ago
Weirdest Opening Ever!!!
by newengland7 17 minutes ago
Willie Nelson v Ray Charles
by AussieRookie 27 minutes ago
Chess legends. Where would be Carlson's position in a list?
by Boris_McQueen 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!