17409 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Do you think that it's useful studying games unannotated? Because today there are a lot of games collections, but it's difficult to find a good Morphy, Steinitz, Lasker, Rubinstein or Capablanca good games annotated collections
Larsens 50 games is a very good book with 50 annotated games.
Reti's Masters of the chessboard features excellent annotated games of Morphy, Steinitz, Lasker and Capablanca (and many others)
The Reti book is a classic, as is Bronstein's Zurich 1953 tournament book.
300 Chess Games of Tarraschs...for those of you who speak spanish there is a recent edition in español of that fine book; Editorial: La casa del ajedrez. Losts of french, Ruy Lopez and..yes 300 games of chess annotated by him.
Like others, I won't answer the question, I'll recommend a book.
Unannotated games can be very helpful, especially with modern databases to sort them. You can play through games in given opening variation one after the other, slowly enough to see what is going on but without trying to analyze too deeply, perhaps 15 minutes per game.
That way the patterns gradually become recognizable. You see the common strategies for both sides, and even the typical tactical shots that come up through the middlegame and right to the ending.
Of course, well-annotated games can be great for learning and entertainment, too. You don't have to choose just one or the other - use both!
EQ is more important then IQ in chess
by The_Ghostess_Lola a few minutes ago
7/24/2016 - Attack And Defense
by LisaHaga a few minutes ago
win against higher rated opponent
by ChessOath a few minutes ago
by lofina_eidel_ismail 3 minutes ago
by notmtwain 4 minutes ago
Test your chess understanding!
by PArnaudov 5 minutes ago
2826-4000 Worst Things To Do While Playing Chess
by egoole 6 minutes ago
chess.com +2000 tactics seems easier for me!
by ChessOfPlayer 11 minutes ago
London system scrubs
by Justs99171 11 minutes ago
What do you say one move from mating your opponent!
by egoole 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!