If you are asking me then I would say yes. I am told by many people (masters included) that my rating should be around 2000 even though I am rated 590. I tried their theory out and found that I can beat the Li bot(with difficulty) Therefore that means the bots ratings are correct.
Are Bot's ratings accurate?
Sort:
The bots tend to be much weaker than there rating.
May 7, 2021
0
#84
chessking8244 wrote:
If you are asking me then I would say yes. I am told by many people (masters included) that my rating should be around 2000 even though I am rated 590. I tried their theory out and found that I can beat the Li bot(with difficulty) Therefore that means the bots ratings are correct.
You are joking, right?
May 12, 2021
0
#85
No, I am not. I had to use the analysis so I did not misclick. I won that game.
May 12, 2021
0
#86
If it was an in-person game (which I know won't happen) and I was given infinite time again. I would have the same outcome.
May 12, 2021
0
#87
By the way, If you are looking at my ratings then look at the number of games I played as well. If that can clarify your confusion.
May 12, 2021
0
#88
chessking8244 wrote:
If you are asking me then I would say yes. I am told by many people (masters included) that my rating should be around 2000 even though I am rated 590. I tried their theory out and found that I can beat the Li bot(with difficulty) Therefore that means the bots ratings are correct.
Ummmm, that's not what that means. Not only do we have no prof that any master has told you your rating should be 2000 but even if thats correct, and they aren't overestimating you( I think they are) that only means Li's rating is correct, I can consistently beat the 1200 ratied adaptive bot and have beaten antonio (1500) but im rated under 500 so......
May 12, 2021
0
#90
Jayden_Griffin wrote:
chessking8244 wrote:
If you are asking me then I would say yes. I am told by many people (masters included) that my rating should be around 2000 even though I am rated 590. I tried their theory out and found that I can beat the Li bot(with difficulty) Therefore that means the bots ratings are correct.
Ummmm, that's not what that means. Not only do we have no prof that any master has told you your rating should be 2000 but even if thats correct, and they aren't overestimating you( I think they are) that only means Li's rating is correct, I can consistently beat the 1200 ratied adaptive bot and have beaten antonio (1500) but im rated under 500 so......
Obviously you don't have proof. You weren't there when I was told. Also, Antonio is easy to beat Wally is where it gets hard for me.
May 12, 2021
0
#91
If you think I am a liar, fine. But I tell the truth and that's why many people I know trust me.
Is there much relevance to ratings period? Only in context. Here are my stats:
1) I beat all the bots often until Wally. After a few games you learn their openings, tricks, etc.
2) My Elometer rating is in the 1400’s based on an exhaustive test
3) my rapid rating is 733 I believe. I am still on a steady increase.
4) my blitz is around 250, I am usually winning and then blunder or stalemate
5) my daily rating is in the 300’s (but I only play a 1200+ opponent)
6) my USCF official rating is 100. I played one sketchy tournament (4 games) as unrated most opponents also unrated and rules were not followed.
Now you tell me whether I am 100 or 1600. I am in that range. At some point this is an existential question. Ratings only matters in context. My guess is my rapid rating is probably the most accurate.
May 12, 2021
0
#95
chessking8244 wrote:
If you are asking me then I would say yes. I am told by many people (masters included) that my rating should be around 2000 even though I am rated 590. I tried their theory out and found that I can beat the Li bot(with difficulty) Therefore that means the bots ratings are correct.
You are not 2000. You have played some 600 blitz games and are under 1100 blitz. Not to mention your rapid is under 1200. The bot ratings are inflated. Period. By your logic I am better than Beth Harmon.
May 12, 2021
0
#96
Actually, I played only 800 games. The current rate at which I mean I COULD be 2000. I did not say I was 2000 at all. I still state it is a theory.
By the way, I am closing my account bye.
The bots are fairly accurate.
for example Gotham chess played his own bot and drew 3 times in a row!
If you beat one of the bots once out of 20 it doesn’t mean that’s your rating. You should win 50% of the time and that would be your rating.
So play a bot 10 times with no help and in a 10-15 min game ... if you win 5 that’s a good indication that you’re about that level if you win more than five go up and bots if you lose more than five go down
May 12, 2021
0
#98
chessking8244 wrote:
Actually, I played only 800 games. The current rate at which I mean I COULD be 2000. I did not say I was 2000 at all. I still state it is a theory.
By the way, I am closing my account bye.
Did we just make him close his account? If so I feel a little bad, but probably not it's likely there are other reasons.
Jayden_Griffin wrote:
chessking8244 wrote:
Actually, I played only 800 games. The current rate at which I mean I COULD be 2000. I did not say I was 2000 at all. I still state it is a theory.
By the way, I am closing my account bye.
Did we just make him close his account? If so I feel a little bad, but probably not it's likely there are other reasons.
No worries, quite normal here... Prolly he just gonna open another, not so "hot", one... 
May 13, 2021
0
#100
QSO67 wrote:
Jayden_Griffin wrote:
chessking8244 wrote:
Actually, I played only 800 games. The current rate at which I mean I COULD be 2000. I did not say I was 2000 at all. I still state it is a theory.
By the way, I am closing my account bye.
Did we just make him close his account? If so I feel a little bad, but probably not it's likely there are other reasons.
No worries, quite normal here... Prolly he just gonna open another, not so "hot", one...
Ok, but I don't understand why hot is in quotation marks
I'm quite literally rated high 400 and I can beat the "Komodo9" engine bot (the one you adjust the rating of) which is rated 1300 adn I'm getting close to beating it at 1400.