Bishop or Knight?

Sort:
Avatar of IHaveTHEChessSkill

Bishops> knight open posi. knight> bishop close pos.

Avatar of Hirun1
Knights definitely
Avatar of hardrock241
Knight are way better
Avatar of MinimilkChess

I like knights mostly because of how flexible they are. You don't need to open up a lane to use them.

Avatar of MinimilkChess
Art0fArcane wrote:
MinimilkChess wrote:

I like knights mostly because of how flexible they are. You don't need to open up a lane to use them.

at the same time, knights are predictable, you can see where they can go and they have to be really close to attack anything. You are right, but I just think they have better attack patterns.

 

Avatar of Bing55
MinimilkChess wrote:

I like knights mostly because of how flexible they are. You don't need to open up a lane to use them.

Well, you still need to secure good outposts for them to be effective, though.

Avatar of 3minutes
In bullet the knight is better since you opponent takes longer to figure out all the options
Avatar of MinimilkChess
Bing55 wrote:

Well, you still need to secure good outposts for them to be effective, though.

True. I guess I just like the tactical play.

 

Avatar of NobleElevator

Okay i read all the comments I think I have read enough opinions xD

Avatar of acceptablecheddar

Bobby Fischer says that a bishop is slightly more than a knight, 3.25 points rather than 3

Avatar of Endroxity

i would say stop arguing a knight is 1000.11 while a bishop is 0.12

Avatar of EnergeticHay
Levent_Acemi wrote:

But that's not a reason that you won't play Exchange variation on Ruy Lopez :)

yep, position matters too!

Avatar of 23Dragons
chessnoob4151 wrote:

i drank too much water and now im drunk

no, that makes you choke. How to get drunk? Knock yourself out with a chair and you'll experience the same hangover.(i wouldn't know, im underage as well)

Avatar of Trailboy99
Knights scare me for the amount of unseen damage they can do in just one or two moves. When playing a skilled opponent, I would gladly sacrifice my bishop for his knight.
Avatar of EnergeticHay
Trailboy99 wrote:
Knights scare me for the amount of unseen damage they can do in just one or two moves. When playing a skilled opponent, I would gladly sacrifice my bishop for his knight.

lol same here!

Avatar of AidenChen2013

Me two

 

Avatar of Nkai20

I've read an article about chess pieces of old. Apparently the Bishop was the Elephant, back when chess was created in India.

 

An Elephant is so much nicer than a Bishop, and less creepy. Sugestion to chess.com: Create an option to play with an Elephant instead of a Bishop, same range, same piece, but different model. Put your graphic artists to work on it, and something good will happen this year!

Avatar of chaser941
Of course, In different situations it Varys. Although one benifit of knights is how much more space they can control.
Avatar of Bigdukesix

Opponents knights have demons - this is why I wipe them out at any cost

Avatar of Gabriel1326
Honestly, I am not in favor of bishops being worth 4 points. That’s too close to the value of a rook. I think in general that it is better to have 2 bishops than 2 knights but they are otherwise equal