Why the huge discrepancy with your results and play on chess.com? Do you get drunk to play on chess.com but take play with a computer seriously?
Fifteen years ago I had my first bout of "competitive intuition". When this happens I suddenly can see 10-15 moves deep in complex middlegames. When I came up with an improvement in the Blumenfeld Countergambit, I called GM Lev Alburt to discuss my new idea. He disagreed with me. I defended my point of view and we began arguing over the phone. The next thing that happened is that it became a blitz game over the phone. I had a strong attack and Lev later told me I was winning in the middlegame, but mishandled the attack. Lev offered me a draw and I accepted. It is the only game we ever played.
I though that you have said in the past that you have been a Lev Alburt student for the past 25 years. How is it possible that you only had play once?
It was out of respect. He didnt want to humiliate Alburt.
It's also much more convenient. No empirical data to prove anything. When this guy becomes world famous for his chess genius (???) and Alburt claims not to know him...
Here is a quote from GM Alburt, "I've been consulting Richard Moody on various chess openings for about 25 years. Today, Richard is an unrelenting opening researcher, well skilled in using all the tools of the trade---books, data bases, Fritz. His book is another proof that one doesn't have to be a Master to make important discoveries. And making your own opening theory is one of the surest paths to success in chess."
Quoted in what publication? I'd like to look it up. And my previous post was that you had no empirical proof of actually playing chess against Lev Alburt.
Why the huge discrepancy with your results and play on chess.com? Do you get drunk to play on chess.com but take play with a computer seriously?
Fifteen years ago I had my first bout of "competitive intuition". When this happens I suddenly can see 10-15 moves deep in complex middlegames. When I came up with an improvement in the Blumenfeld Countergambit, I called GM Lev Alburt to discuss my new idea. He disagreed with me. I defended my point of view and we began arguing over the phone. The next thing that happened is that it became a blitz game over the phone. I had a strong attack and Lev later told me I was winning in the middlegame, but mishandled the attack. Lev offered me a draw and I accepted. It is the only game we ever played.
I though that you have said in the past that you have been a Lev Alburt student for the past 25 years. How is it possible that you only had play once?
It was out of respect. He didnt want to humiliate Alburt.
It's also much more convenient. No empirical data to prove anything. When this guy becomes world famous for his chess genius (???) and Alburt claims not to know him...
Here is a quote from GM Alburt, "I've been consulting Richard Moody on various chess openings for about 25 years. Today, Richard is an unrelenting opening researcher, well skilled in using all the tools of the trade---books, data bases, Fritz. His book is another proof that one doesn't have to be a Master to make important discoveries. And making your own opening theory is one of the surest paths to success in chess."