Chess.com Analysis -- Blunder or Brilliant?

I'm just playing these for fun, I'm not trying to crush anyone.

Some people drop pieces early while others seem to try a little harder.

Although I admit when the rating is higher I put some analysis into it.

One game in particular I shared with Hammer (still ongoing so I wont post it) I worked for over an hour on some analysis.

But others I play at bullet speed... not even blitz, bullet

You seem desperate for my attention, so this post is just letting you know, that yes, I see you.

lol

you really aren't being funny, you're just embarrassing yourself.

This post has moved on from whether Rh1 was a blunder to something childish. @1a3_1-0 Are you saying if there is a difference of 500 or 750 or 1000 games should be won in less than 25 moves? If so Anand must have had an off day when he played you. Obviously you could not have made any good moves just like a player rated under 1000 can't make good moves or play a good game. @ForeverChessYay Language evolves. Guy is becoming a general term for a person and is less offensive then the more accurate term of ignoramus. If people want to get their knickers in a twist about the most trivial of things then please go to itakeoffenseateverything.com. I have no idea whether this website actually exists but I feel like it should.

I never even said that. Besides, you, a 1500, shouldn't be trying to teach me these things about chess. I agree, people on this site like you are very toxic and they and you should take your advice and go to itakeoffenseateverything.com.

Ok, the game that I spent a lot of time on ended, so I want to post it because it was fun for the white player (me) because I sacrificed and I was the one with lots of active pieces 

tl;dr
25...Bb7 holds for black
26.Qc5 is an only move I was happy to find that makes the tactics work in my favor

ofc you only show games where you won, typical

Typical of what?

First of all, I showed my first loss a few days ago... the topic was removed by a moderator (and my opponent was banned the next day).

Also it's in response to your previous post about my play. I said I played fast in some games but took time in others. This was the aforementioned game where I took time. I'm not just posting it randomly.

You only posted that because you were targeting your opponent and saying they were cheating.

What? Now way!

I was praising my opponent for his amazing play 😇

Right! I totally believe you!

Yeah, I mean, screaming MY 800 RATED OPPONENT PLAYED JUST LIKE STOCKFISH is a compliment right?

I don't know why the mods were mad at me 

I have posted lost games in the analysis section before and asked for advice... just for the record.

But obviously in showcase or general discussion no one is going to post losses... it's sort of silly.

And also... just being honestly... people like Pfren and Poucin who could answer complicated questions really well and teach me a lot aren't going to bother. Not unless I pay them as a coach. They go after the low hanging fruit so to speak... and of course they give good analysis, but in the end they're answering pretty simple questions like what can I play besides the fried liver or something.

I've actually asked some questions like that, about the Maroczy for example. I posted several different opening move orders that lead to that structure and asked why the plans depend on certain pieces and piece placement.

Poucin told me to buy a thick book and study it

Which is the correct answer I suppose, but yeah, I didn't get much out of that.

But I don't post games I won in the forums either.

Then how is one supposed to ask for advice on a game they lost if they wish to do it in a forum?

Yeah, but you don't win any games so... 😈

Post it in the analysis section is my answer to that.

But sure, sometimes people ask in the general discussion. That's fine.