Come on, guys... I don't even see this "is" thing. This is a stupid reason for you guys to fight. I must remind you that grammar is not the only reflection of intellect. No comment on the cheating controversy that some people have raised, but I don't think you should judge @Alltheusernamestaken so harshly for something so insignificant.
https://sunnah.com/nawawi40/13
None of you [truly] believes until he loves for his brother that which he loves for himself.
;-)
reality can be at least complex, like a chess game.
Since I started to understand the meaning of the moves and stopped playing the Pirc, going back to giuoco piano I got quite amazing results in the last 300+ games. It took me 3 months to go from 700 to 1100 and 20 days to go from 1100 to 1500.
Did anyone have had a similar experience? if so, why?
Funny you should mention it. I seldom play it, but I won two games with the Giuoco Piano in two days in daily chess. Both of my opponents played 3...h6, the anti-Fried Liver Defense though I never intended the Fried Liver Attack. 3...h6 wastes a piece-development tempo and chess.com's Opening Explorer shows White does very well against it.
I never said playing miniatures meant you cheated. I also never accused you of cheating I simply stated a series of fact
The fact is that my rating is lower than my record and in my games feed I lost 4 and won 3, I also did a tournament and lost a ton
Why are you saying this? I have told you you play extremely well sometimes and have not accused you of cheating? Why do you need to point out that you lost games? I have even said you are inconsistent but if you could keep that play up you could do well.
Dude becose you say 'extremly well' wtf does this mean? I play normal, I obviously have good and bad games as everybody
below 0,1 centipawn loss is extremely good. To give you a sense of scale in our game I had 0,7 and you had 1,03. You played more then 7 times better then I did in the game against you. I didn't play badly in that game, no game losing blunder though my endgame play was far from perfect.
But the 0,1 was only kept up by you for about moves because the games were miniatures (that's why I said you win a lot of miniatures) so it's not impossible to play that well. It's just impressive.
this is funny, how more balant does it have to be then this?
Plus this guy could just be an up and down player whose actual skill level is in the 2000's
2000 skill is not making 100% best move, thats not even super GM, askhat chandra got banned from here for having like 70% best move guys, its pure stockfish and I don't know how you guys don't see how balant this is.
2000 skill is not making 100% best move, thats not even super GM, askhat chandra got banned from here for having like 70% best move guys, its pure stockfish and I don't know how you guys don't see how balant this is.
Yes selective engine use. It muddies the water just enough to make people think twice before accusing. Because most people are honorable and don't understand the mentality of a cheater.
Why would anyone waste time making moves that a computer tells you to make? Its a complete waste of time but reflects some deep psychological issues.
well, it is true that when your opponent plays badly it is easier to make perfect moves, there was an article on that somewhere last year.
2000 skill is not making 100% best move, thats not even super GM, askhat chandra got banned from here for having like 70% best move guys, its pure stockfish and I don't know how you guys don't see how balant this is.
Yes selective engine use. It muddies the water just enough to make people think twice before accusing. Because most people are honorable and don't understand the mentality of a cheater.
Why would anyone waste time making moves that a computer tells you to make? Its a complete waste of time but reflects some deep psychological issues.
I totally agree, and this is why I am saying its soooo balant, he didn't try to cover up the games he cheated in, he did 100% best move, other games he played not so great, but that does not muddy the water much
Omegalul this room xd
I never said playing miniatures meant you cheated. I also never accused you of cheating I simply stated a series of fact
The fact is that my rating is lower than my record and in my games feed I lost 4 and won 3, I also did a tournament and lost a ton
Why are you saying this? I have told you you play extremely well sometimes and have not accused you of cheating? Why do you need to point out that you lost games? I have even said you are inconsistent but if you could keep that play up you could do well.
Dude becose you say 'extremly well' wtf does this mean? I play normal, I obviously have good and bad games as everybody
below 0,1 centipawn loss is extremely good. To give you a sense of scale in our game I had 0,7 and you had 1,03. You played more then 7 times better then I did in the game against you. I didn't play badly in that game, no game losing blunder though my endgame play was far from perfect.
But the 0,1 was only kept up by you for about moves because the games were miniatures (that's why I said you win a lot of miniatures) so it's not impossible to play that well. It's just impressive.
I played 7 times better???? You won man and it could have been a draw becouse the giuoco is my main opening, I'm sure you would win in other openings
Well you can think whatever you want guys
I think you have reached a plateau. Welcome to the club.
better work on those middle games to reach 1700 and put shame to all of these cheating accusations. 
Well you can think whatever you want guys
I think you have reached a plateau. Welcome to the club.
Sadly yes 
Does this graph seem like a cheater graph? 
Cheating has nothing to do with the win/lose ratio. Using engine assistance in one out of hundred games is still considered cheating.
Inhale, exhale... that's the spirit...