How do I know if I'm actually improving in chess?

Sort:
Avatar of 26bdn82jdUeba3wu

This was bullet lmao

Avatar of KingCobra280
1Nc31-O wrote:

Learn 2 knights vs pawn endgame.

LMAO ended up with it once and had to resist the urge to take the pawn until the correct moment

k

Avatar of ninjaswat
KingCobra280 wrote:
ninjaswat wrote:
KingCobra280 wrote:
ninjaswat wrote:

It's not about ELO, it's about what you learn about the game. Why don't you take some time off from playing and study endgame and the B+H checkmate? You'll see improvement afterwards.

alright but I never have bishop and horse endgames

Shoot meant B+B...

I already know that. I've been practising it with myself. White has 2 bishops and black has only a king. I make random but good moves for black while I checkmate with my 2 bishops. I'm good at it now. And I dont think that means I'm crazy 

Have you done the drill against the engine yet? Also, DO ENDGAMES

Avatar of 26bdn82jdUeba3wu
ninjaswat wrote:
KingCobra280 wrote:
ninjaswat wrote:
KingCobra280 wrote:
ninjaswat wrote:

It's not about ELO, it's about what you learn about the game. Why don't you take some time off from playing and study endgame and the B+H checkmate? You'll see improvement afterwards.

alright but I never have bishop and horse endgames

Shoot meant B+B...

I already know that. I've been practising it with myself. White has 2 bishops and black has only a king. I make random but good moves for black while I checkmate with my 2 bishops. I'm good at it now. And I dont think that means I'm crazy 

Have you done the drill against the engine yet? Also, DO ENDGAMES

I don't believe in studying endgames lmao except basic ones. I tend to just uh, logicaly work them out with practice.

Probs why I'm not 1700 rapid

Avatar of assassin3752
KingCobra280 wrote:
1Nc31-O wrote:

Learn 2 knights vs pawn endgame.

LMAO ended up with it once and had to resist the urge to take the pawn until the correct moment

k

yea but only prob is 2 knights vs pawn endgames r very rare

Avatar of ninjaswat
1Nc31-O wrote:
ninjaswat wrote:
KingCobra280 wrote:
ninjaswat wrote:
KingCobra280 wrote:
ninjaswat wrote:

It's not about ELO, it's about what you learn about the game. Why don't you take some time off from playing and study endgame and the B+H checkmate? You'll see improvement afterwards.

alright but I never have bishop and horse endgames

Shoot meant B+B...

I already know that. I've been practising it with myself. White has 2 bishops and black has only a king. I make random but good moves for black while I checkmate with my 2 bishops. I'm good at it now. And I dont think that means I'm crazy 

Have you done the drill against the engine yet? Also, DO ENDGAMES

I don't believe in studying endgames lmao except basic ones. I tend to just uh, logicaly work them out with practice.

Probs why I'm not 1700 rapid

I practice the practical endgames against the computer so I KNOW I can convert

Avatar of ninjaswat

Also considering you have 56 games your rating is still unknown...

Avatar of 26bdn82jdUeba3wu
ninjaswat wrote:

Also considering you have 56 games your rating is still unknown...

20 games in a category is enough. I've played about 150 games in bullet once and ended up around 1800 before wildly going up and down. No one really has a "stable" rating.

Avatar of IsraeliGal

you don't improve in chess over a span of a month. It takes years to have a visible improvement that is significant. 

Don't expect your rating to sky rocket after a month.

Just play your games, study and analyse them, practice your puzzles and watch informational tutorials, and you will naturally improve.

If you practice something, you will improve regardless, it's impossible not to. 

As long as you're patient and reasonable, and don't obsess over your rating, you'll be fine.

 

Avatar of TheRevenant66

Just play a lot of unrated games and start using new strategies then you get better.

Avatar of KingCobra280

thanks guys

Avatar of assassin3752

yw

Avatar of Nennerb

Keep playing chess and hope for an epiphany/revelation

Avatar of anhbao123

You need to actually learn something to improve, if you keep making the same mistake over and over again you'll never get better. Before making a move, consider it's good or bad by using things that you learned, you need to actually think to win, think about what would your opponent do after your move, that's a problem that many beginners and intermediates have. That's sometimes also my problem, when I'm not in a good mood, I usually think very poorly and using time ineffectively by spending time without really thinking.

Avatar of KingCobra280

thx

Avatar of marqumax

You won't always improve, but know that all the work you put in chess will pay dividends sooner or later. For example you might practice a lot now, but your rating might not improve much for the next 6 months, or might even go down. But at some point. Say after 6 months for example, you will start improving much more rapidly than you would have if you haven't put that work now. Do you get what I mean?

Avatar of Rogeriokkw

d

Avatar of FawazSyed69

Try ig, you won't improve if you can't even if you try for years, and you will improve if you can in the span of days

Avatar of FawazSyed69
Rogeriokkw wrote:

d

dam bro thanks for sharing

Avatar of KingCobra280
marqumax wrote:

You won't always improve, but know that all the work you put in chess will pay dividends sooner or later. For example you might practice a lot now, but your rating might not improve much for the next 6 months, or might even go down. But at some point. Say after 6 months for example, you will start improving much more rapidly than you would have if you haven't put that work now. Do you get what I mean?

ya