I could hypothetically beat Vishwanathan Anand if I really wanted to
Sort:
Jan 30, 2021
0
#63
MervinHenderson wrote:
Dsmith42 wrote:
Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.
Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.
I can think 278 moves ahead you noob
rychessmaster1 wrote:
MervinHenderson wrote:
Dsmith42 wrote:
Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.
Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.
I can think 278 moves ahead you noob
Look these blitz games make me blunder. I am pretty sure I could win a match versus you in a long time control game. Wanna play 1? 60 mins or daily?
jbent02 wrote:
my man has good opening knowledge but just resigned on move 7 lol
Gawd blitz games. They take no skill whatsoever. And I told you blundering on time pressure is my style so obviously blitz games are not even my kind of game
Jan 30, 2021
0
#68
Speed games are a bit silly, sure, but only two types of people say they take "no skill"
1) People rated very low in speed games
2) You (aka trolls)
Jan 30, 2021
0
#69
MervinHenderson wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
MervinHenderson wrote:
Dsmith42 wrote:
Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.
Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.
I can think 278 moves ahead you noob
Look these blitz games make me blunder. I am pretty sure I could win a match versus you in a long time control game. Wanna play 1? 60 mins or daily?
dude...you joined 1 day ago, and you think you can beat an NM? you must be some 600 rated noob.
GM_chess_player wrote:
MervinHenderson wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
MervinHenderson wrote:
Dsmith42 wrote:
Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.
Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.
I can think 278 moves ahead you noob
Look these blitz games make me blunder. I am pretty sure I could win a match versus you in a long time control game. Wanna play 1? 60 mins or daily?
dude...you joined 1 day ago. you must be some 600 rated noob.
How can I be 600 when I'm rated 1600? Not that rating means anything but even in terms of a arbitrary numeral I'm way above 600
Jan 30, 2021
0
#71
MervinHenderson wrote:
GM_chess_player wrote:
MervinHenderson wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
MervinHenderson wrote:
Dsmith42 wrote:
Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.
Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.
I can think 278 moves ahead you noob
Look these blitz games make me blunder. I am pretty sure I could win a match versus you in a long time control game. Wanna play 1? 60 mins or daily?
dude...you joined 1 day ago. you must be some 600 rated noob.
How can I be 600 when I'm rated 1600? Not that rating means anything but even in terms of a arbitrary numeral I'm way above 600
1600 isn't even your actual rating because you haven't played many games, and even if it was, you think you're better than an NM?
He's 2600, and you are, 1600, and you think you're actually better than him.
Congrats, you've made me laugh.
Jan 30, 2021
0
#72
MervinHenderson wrote:
jbent02 wrote:
my man has good opening knowledge but just resigned on move 7 lol
Gawd blitz games. They take no skill whatsoever. And I told you blundering on time pressure is my style so obviously blitz games are not even my kind of game
...on move 7... with all your time left... move...7...resigned...
jbent02 wrote:
Challenging you to a daily, claim time trouble now
Dude...daily games with 48 hours time control? So I'm in the kitchen cooking. And every few be minutes I must be distracted by your ping ping move alerts?no way let's play 5 min game
So far, I have played 17,145 in many categories of chess. I just play for fun. I have played against many 2000+ rated players. Most of times, I got defeated. Only a very few times, I have had won.
It doesn't matter who your opponent is. What matters is just playing. 
MervinHenderson wrote:
jbent02 wrote:
Challenging you to a daily, claim time trouble now
Dude...daily games with 48 hours time control? So I'm in the kitchen cooking. And every few be minutes I must be distracted by your ping ping move alerts?no way let's play 5 min game
that sounds like a cop out
Big brother is watching!
Jan 30, 2021
0
#78
MervinHenderson wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
MervinHenderson wrote:
Dsmith42 wrote:
Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.
Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.
I can think 278 moves ahead you noob
Look these blitz games make me blunder. I am pretty sure I could win a match versus you in a long time control game. Wanna play 1? 60 mins or daily?
10/0, take it or leave it
MervinHenderson wrote:
jbent02 wrote:
Challenging you to a daily, claim time trouble now
Dude...daily games with 48 hours time control? So I'm in the kitchen cooking. And every few be minutes I must be distracted by your ping ping move alerts?no way let's play 5 min game
I think you're confused. Every move can be done in 48 hours or less. It isn't like you have 48 hours on your clock, you can do a move in 48 hours. Your opponent's next move can be done in other 48 hours. Then you move again, and you have 48 hours left to do a move. Did i explain well?
You could also hypothetically lose to him even if you really didn't want to, so... there's that.
@llama47 You are becoming too intelligent day by day.