@IronTiger, @TheGrobe, @Sapiendust: I am looking forward to hear from you if you discuss topics at your own capacity.
psychic chess masters
Sort:
Unfortunately there's a signal-to-noise problem here.
Master_Valek wrote:
Sunshiny wrote:
Yes, it could land heads, tails, or on its side. However, there's an infinite number of possibilities that could affect the flip.
If you calculate (2 x 2 x 2...) one hundred times, you have calculated the amount of possibilities required to make universes from the action of coin throwing, 100 times exactly, giving 10^30 possibilities exactly.
No if's, no but's.
Now slowly step away from the keyboard and get down on your knees and put your hands behind your back. Not sure how many beers you had but you are way over the limit to be online. Taking you to the county jail till you sober up!
TheGrobe wrote:
Unfortunately there's a signal-to-noise problem here.
I do not see what you mean, the noise is exactly zero times the signal.
A pointless and inflamatory post.
Master_Valek wrote:
It certainly isn't less than this like someone was claiming. At least I had the sense first to write it exactly to the correct power, not to the very last digit. If you want the number spot on, exactly to the very last digit, I have already wrote it out... I was the first one here anyway to do this.
Are you referring to when i said it could be much more or much less? If life was predetermined, there would be no choices and no other universes opening up. There would only be one path and one universe, unless it was predetermined that there are other universes. Nothing new would be created though.
No, but whether the universe is predetermined has to do with flipping a coin would open up new universes. In a predetermined universe, the coin flip is no longer random, and that number given is no longer true (on the assumption that it is, not saying that it is true.)
Master_Valek wrote:
LoekBergman wrote:
@IronTiger, @TheGrobe, @Sapiendust: I am looking forward to hear from you if you discuss topics at your own capacity.
Which is limited to say the least.
Yes, everything and everyone has its limits, but I have a lot of respect for their limits. To say the least.
Well first you have to define predetermined and from which perspective. As God already knows so it it predetermined from his position.
royalbishop wrote:
Well first you have to define predetermined and from which perspective. As God already knows so it it predetermined from his position.
Let's not go there.
Edit: Predetermined meaning everything is meant to happen the way it has happened, and there are no choices and nothing is random.
It started with Alpha and end with Omega Sushiny.
We have choices but he already knows what we will do before we think it. Like sitting their watching my daughter. Then all of the sudden she says daddy. Now all day she has been walking around bored and i see steam coming from her head. I know where that is going. And i am always pretty sure i know what she means by when she says daddy. And she pretty much knows my response before she asks. But we still the song and dance.
So you want to get this thread locked?
Locked for stupidity of maths. Clearly.
Here's a better physics thread, as least due to posts by @Kingpatzer --
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/has-light-got-a-decay-factor
Higher entertainment value as well.
You brought it up now drop it as this is only your 2nd post here.
It is like .... to talk about predetermined.
No education means you will struggle in your life but not say that you can not become a millionaire. But it is a lot easier to become one if you know how understand what you read and in some countries just learn how to read.
Take also into account if you do not have a way to get connected to the internet and instant get info your a step behind the norm. Not sure if that is predetermined that you will suffer but the have see it that way for the have nots and some will keep it that way as they do not want you in their community or cirles where they visit every day.
This is starting sound like i hear from the old ball and chain. If the wife not happy nobody is going to be happy. As the wife is always right!!!!
royalbishop wrote:
You brought it up now drop it as this is only your 2nd post here.
It is like .... to talk about predetermined.
No education means you will struggle in your life but not say that you can not become a millionaire. But it is a lot easier to become one if you know how understand what you read and in some countries just learn how to read.
Take also into account if you do not have a way to get connected to the internet and instant get info your a step behind the norm. Not sure if that is predetermined that you will suffer but the have see it that way for the have nots and some will keep it that way as they do not want you in their community or cirles where they visit every day.
Who are you referring to here? The rest of what you said isn't clear either.
Why you got ressurercted will never understand master!
Have garlic and bits-of-wood already selected. Just needing to bottle some sunlight then we're off.
@Sunshiny
You have left so many comments here. Show your true face on your avatars.
Funny. I was just reading on another thread about how you can tell by someone's avatar whether or not they have multiple accounts or something to that effect. (This is my only account.)
How do you know this avatar isn't representative of me, much like how the avatars are representative of others(, and are not their "true faces?")
It certainly isn't less than this like someone was claiming. At least I had the sense first to write it exactly to the correct power, not to the very last digit. If you want the number spot on, exactly to the very last digit, I have already wrote it out... I was the first one here anyway to do this.
They find it far more interesting to beat you up over semantics than to focus on the concept that was conveyed quite clearly enough. I used to work for a director who had a Ph.d. in physics, in a recording technology lab, and he used to say, frequently, regarding tolerances and the like, "Good enough for who it's for".
Did he say "it's exactly equal"? Probably not, which is entirely the point here.