sorry to disappoint you man, but i went from 0 to 1550 in one day in an actual tournament, I was unrated at the start of it. Suck on that!
Is my jump in rating unprecedented?
Sort:
MGleason wrote:
Chessislife2013 wrote:
Dear moderator, if you wish to remove part of my statement because it was insulting to a large group of people, then do so. But please do not falsely insert that it was "political commentary." It was not "commentary," it was an insult to the intellect of a group of people. If you wish to correct someone, kindly be objective and correct yourself.
Would you prefer I use the term "political insult"? I can change it...
Indeed I would, thank you.
General-TsoTso wrote:
sorry to disappoint you man, but i went from 0 to 1550 in one day in an actual tournament, I was unrated at the start of it. Suck on that!
In my first 8 games I went from unrated to 1741.
Feb 21, 2017
0
#185
Chessislife2013 wrote:
MGleason wrote:
Chessislife2013 wrote:
Dear moderator, if you wish to remove part of my statement because it was insulting to a large group of people, then do so. But please do not falsely insert that it was "political commentary." It was not "commentary," it was an insult to the intellect of a group of people. If you wish to correct someone, kindly be objective and correct yourself.
Would you prefer I use the term "political insult"? I can change it...
Indeed I would, thank you.
Done. There is an Open Discussion group where you can talk politics if you want, BTW.
Feb 21, 2017
0
#186
Chessislife2013 wrote:
General-TsoTso wrote:
sorry to disappoint you man, but i went from 0 to 1550 in one day in an actual tournament, I was unrated at the start of it. Suck on that!
In my first 8 games I went from unrated to 1741.
Guys, good news. I just beat an 1100 twice!
Here's one of the games
Feb 22, 2017
0
#188
That was actually a really cool game, tbh
Mainly because you had 2 queens on the board for more than half the game
Cherub_Enjel wrote:
That was actually a really cool game, tbh
Mainly because you had 2 queens on the board for more than half the game
Could have I checkmated him earlier you think?
Amazing! You will definitely become a GM in few months!
Pashak1989 wrote:
Amazing! You will definitely become a GM in few months!
Thanks dude! Have you any tips regarding the game I just posted. Would love to hear some expertise on the subject.
No, everything was absolutely perfect! I will send it to Magnus Carlsen so he can learn a couple of things.
Cherub_Enjel wrote:
Maybe, but there was definitely not need to lol
Seriously though, at what move after getting the queen would you have been able to checkmate him?
Pashak1989 wrote:
No, everything was absolutely perfect! I will send it to Magnus Carlsen so he can learn a couple of things.
Pashak, I might be Magnus Carlsen in disguise...
Nah, you are way better than him. You can actually see mates in 3.
VladimirHerceg91 wrote:
i completely agree
Pashak1989 wrote:
No, everything was absolutely perfect! I will send it to Magnus Carlsen so he can learn a couple of things.
Pashak, I might be Magnus Carlsen in disguise...
Feb 22, 2017
0
#198
You should have played 18. Bxf3, bringing another piece into the attack. You've got to activate your men so they can join in the king hunt.
urk wrote:
You should have played 18. Bxf3, bringing another piece into the attack. You've got to activate your men so they can join in the king hunt.
I totally missed that one, thanks Urk.
Yes, your improvement is good but some my students got comparable increase in ratings. At lower base such jump is surely possible. Even at rating levels of say 1500-1800 some students jump by 200 points in no time. Actually rating never increases in linear fashion but you remain stuck at certain level for a couple of months ( known as plateau of learning ) and then suddenly get big increase in very little time.
Dear moderator, if you wish to remove part of my statement because it was insulting to a large group of people, then do so. But please do not falsely insert that it was "political commentary." It was not "commentary," it was an insult to the intellect of a group of people. If you wish to correct someone, kindly be objective and correct yourself.
Would you prefer I use the term "political insult"? I can change it...