Is There Always a Correct Move?

I have a hunch that if White and Black played perfectly, there are only very few number games out of the vast number of games possible that will lead to White being the winner. It is already a growing trend already... The better the players are, the larger number of draws but White have a slight advantage because it has the initiative (first move).

So, if the previous moves are perfect for White and Black... It will always lead to the conclusion that a best move existed that will lead to White being the winner...

What does that even mean?

It only means like the chess game is like Tic Tac Toe... but chess is also different from that because it is eliminating pieces from the board... Because of these, if chess is perfectly played by both players, White will always be the winner...

Because White have an initiative (first move), he have the advantage of eliminating a piece first from the board which will lead to him being the winner... But that doesn't mean that White must eliminate a piece unnecessarily... I am saying that he have more option to remove threats on the board (either directly or indirectly) than Black.

The direct approach is controlling the square a threat wants to control or removing it from the game... While the indirect approach is to make threat against a threat, like pin and such ( I don't know about the others)

What I mean threats is a piece or controlled square that will lead to a draw or White losing if we can talk objectively or by White's perspective.

But if we include move repetition, the theory will go haywire but it is also hard to repeat moves because of the ability of both players to remove pieces on the board.

This is almost certain to be false. If chess is perfectly played by both players, it will be a draw - almost everyone agrees.

Chess is a draw.
In any drawn position, including the initial position,
there is at least one good move that draws and zero or more mistakes (?) that lose.
In any won position, there is at least one good move that wins,
zero or more mistakes (?) that draw and zero or more blunders (??) that lose.
In any lost position there are no good moves,
only moves that in practice make it subjectively harder for your opponent to win.

Okay...

magipi loves telling people their comments are useless.

We can't do anything about it... He himself have his own reason...

what is up

no he did not

Just an old topic being brought to life... But it is okay... It is still a thread anyway...

Which means there cannot only be one correct move.

Therefore you've answered your own question: No

QED

@39

Usually there is more than one correct move.

Look here: all perfect games without errors, all draws, different openings, different defenses, different games, hence more than one correct move.

https://www.iccf.com/event?id=100104

It depends on the situation...