Keep your eyes peeled for this guy, by the way:
MS Jean is gone
Sort:
Sep 25, 2011
0
#483
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Why are all of you avoiding what I am saying, which is that you go around ridiculing everyone you come across, except your fellow ridiculers?
1. Because you're incapable of talking about anything except yourself and how you think everything affects you
2. Because you keep repeating the same crap for the "trillionth" (your latest word) time
3. Because your level of social interaction isn't anywhere near as mature as your claimed age. Your self-centeredness and stubborness and tantrums are more in line with the behavior of a second or third grader
4. Because you keep wading back in to threads that have finally managed to go a few hours without your nonsense, and you start it all back up again (you've already done that before in this thread, and here you are on Sunday with no school and the whole day available to be a pest, doing it again)
5. Because you're in complete denial of your own behavior
6. Because you're a hypocrite
7. Because you're petty and vindictive
8. Because you haven't got an ounce of humor in your entire body
For starters.
On a related note, thank you for finally getting around to blocking me a few days ago like I begged you to quite some time earlier. It won't make any difference, since I don't track any threads you start, but I was feeling neglected.
Sep 25, 2011
0
#484
By mainstream, I mean appearing with other world headlines on the main page of the news source without having to go to the science/technology section.
Cystem_Phailure wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Why are all of you avoiding what I am saying, which is that you go around ridiculing everyone you come across, except your fellow ridiculers?
1. Because you're incapable of talking about anything except yourself and how you think everything affects you
2. Because you keep repeating the same crap for the "trillionth" (your latest word) time
3. Because your level of social interaction isn't anywhere near as mature as your claimed age. Your self-centeredness and stubborness and tantrums are more in line with the behavior of a second or third grader
4. Because you keep wading back in to threads that have finally managed to go a few hours without your nonsense, and you start it all back up again (you've already done that before in this thread, and here you are on Sunday with no school and the whole day available to be a pest, doing it again)
5. Because you're in complete denial of your own behavior
6. Because you're a hypocrite
7. Because you're petty and vindictive
8. Because you haven't got an ounce of humor in your entire body
For starters.
On a related note, thank you for finally getting around to blocking me a few days ago like I begged you to quite some time earlier. It won't make any difference, since I don't track any threads you start, but I was feeling neglected.
+8
corrijean wrote:
I'm surprised this hasn't been in the news much. I've just seen one mainstream article about it.
Too busy with crimes against blonds in Aruba, reality shows and political nonsense.
Sep 25, 2011
0
#487
Neutrinos are so difficult to detect in the first place, you can see why there might be some reluctance to accept these findings without some real scrutiny and attempts at replication. But this might give us some hope for something besides tachyons for backwards time travel. 
Now are you really talking time travel or just "I'll be able to see events from the past by looking at its reflected light wherever it is, but I can't stop them from stepping on that prehistoric butterfly in the time of dinosaurs 5,000 years ago, when humans and dinosaurs first inhabited the earth".
Sep 25, 2011
0
#489
Cystem_Phailure wrote:
Neutrinos are so difficult to detect in the first place, you can see why there might be some reluctance to accept these findings without some real scrutiny and attempts at replication. But this might give us some hope for something besides tachyons for backwards time travel.
The CERN press release was very carefully worded.
I tell you that you are doing this to OTHERS as well as to me, and then claim that I can't talk about anything other than myself two seconds afterward?
Oh, so now suddenly your personal attacks are a joke? "It's just a joke" has been gotten away with for ages, but I will not let that happen this time. It is no longer a "joke" when you begin to attack people (not just me) personally.
We're talking about something else if you don't mind.
Sep 25, 2011
0
#493
dannyhume wrote:
Now are you really talking time travel or just "I'll be able to see events from the past by looking at its reflected light wherever it is, but I can't stop them from stepping on that prehistoric butterfly in the time of dinosaurs 5,000 years ago, when humans and dinosaurs first inhabited the earth".
I think Cystem was really talking about time travel.
There are lots of problems to work out in that area. Paradoxes, grammar, etc.
Grammar? As in what happens if you kill yours?
Sep 25, 2011
0
#497
corrijean wrote: The CERN press release was very carefully worded.
They're the top dogs, or at least within the top circle (get it? ), that's for sure. This isn't like the cold fusion debacle at Utah where a couple of malcontents did an end run around the peer-review process and dumped their crap straight to the press. In this case, even though it's ended up in the press, the whole point of their presentation at the conference seems to have been to invite others to take a look at the findings, which is the proper way to go about something like this.
Sep 25, 2011
0
#498
TheGrobe wrote:
Grammar? As in what happens if you kill yours?
"One of the major problems encountered in time travel is not that of accidentally becoming your own father or mother. ...
The major problem is quite simply one of grammar, and the main work to consult in this matter is Dr Dan Streetmentioner's Time Traveller's Handbook of 1001 Tense Formations. It will tell you for instance how to describe something that was about to happen to you in the past before you avoided it by time-jumping forward two days in order to avoid it. The event will be described differently according to whether you are talking about it from the standpoint of your own natural time, from a time in the further future, or a time in the further past and is further complicated by the possibility of conducting conversations whilst you are actually travelling from one time to another with the intention of becoming your own father or mother.
Most readers get as far as the Future Semi-Conditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional before giving up: and in fact in later editions of the book all the pages beyond this point have been left blank to save on printing costs.
The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy skips lightly over this tangle of academic abstraction, pausing only to note that the term "Future Perfect" has been abandoned since it was discovered not to be."
corrijean wrote:
Isn't the world supposed to end today?
Tomorrow.
Really? From what I've seen it's been impossible to miss.
I guess I do tend to frequent the science and technology news categories mroe than some others though....