bondiggity wrote:
I've played him way back when a couple of times. I reached a "winning" position. Id believe that he isn't using computer assistance.
did you win?
quick game rating over 4000
Sort:
Jul 8, 2009
0
#23
I'm sure he's exceptionally skilled at all of the non-chess elements that go into the 1 0 game.
That being said, I think I could do better than 1 in 20 games against him, so if I could only get him to agree to a 100 game match, then my rating would shoot through the roof! :-)
Jul 8, 2009
0
#24
redsoxfan33 wrote:
bondiggity wrote:
I've played him way back when a couple of times. I reached a "winning" position. Id believe that he isn't using computer assistance.
did you win?
Nope :D. That's why the winning went into quotations. I mean if you are a pawn or two up, but have little time on your clock, is that really winning in a 1 0 game? I'd say no.
My rating in Chess Mentor is 2200 but only 1150 uscf. I am probaly a little underrated, but this system is ridiculous.
I just cannot believe he has basically never gotten disconnected...
BlackWaive wrote:
Due to the "tweaked" Glicko rating system on this site, this guy probably played some sub-1000 players about 2000 times for a free 2000 points.
It says his average opponent is 1596 though.
ADK
i dont believe
I'd like to play against him. If he's not a computer, I'll get at least 1/10.
Note that I have never lost a game in live chess, but I still had 1 disconnection...
Most of the 11 losses he has are due to disconnections. I saw one of his loss where he was disconnected. He lost quite a few points
porcupinetree wrote:
Most of the 11 losses he has are due to disconnections. I saw one of his loss where he was disconnected. He lost quite a few points
but still he played thousands of games, he must have a really good computer or something...
AnthonyCG wrote:
redsoxfan33 wrote:
porcupinetree wrote:
Most of the 11 losses he has are due to disconnections. I saw one of his loss where he was disconnected. He lost quite a few points
but still he played thousands of games, he must have a really good computer or something...
Oh I don't know, maybe he's good at chess? Just thought I'd put that out there.
we all know he is amazing at chess, but it is just that he never gets disconnected, or at least to the point were it just doesn't look right
This is a game Chessnetwork lost:
Given trends continue and two thousand more wins against patzers, Chessnetworks quick rating may reach 6000, does that make him any stronger or weaker than today or yesterday, no. Its an fault with the chess.com grade calculation method ...
87654321 wrote:
Given trends continue and two thousand more wins against patzers, Chessnetworks quick rating may reach 6000, does that make him any stronger or weaker than today or yesterday, no. Its an fault with the chess.com grade calculation method ...
I agree
What is the purpose of this post?
I just wanted to point out his amazing rating, but then it turned into more than I expected.
I've played him way back when a couple of times. I reached a "winning" position. Id believe that he isn't using computer assistance.