Rook, King & Kinght, vs Rook & KIng, A Draw????

Sort:
universityofpawns

Just wondering if it is possible (if your opponent doesn't make a mistake) to force a mate with a rook, king and knight vs a rook and king.....never came up in any of my games in 10 years before without at least an pawn somewhere. This is the end position of the game I refer to, he was nice and gave me a draw, neither of us could see a forced mate: https://www.chess.com/daily/game/152199388?page=1

It was actually a 960 game, but doesn't really make a difference

spidercharlie
Uhhhhh I think so 💭 💭 💭 💭 💭 💭 💭 💭 💭
Ninjakiwi17

It is a draw, but the side with the knight should of course try to win. Your opponent gave you a draw too early

universityofpawns

in bullet that is true, but it daily they have all the time in the world (well almost), and mistake is less likely

Strangemover

It's a draw if you are accurate but he could have tortured you for the full 50 moves and another 3 months so happy days!

fhr

It isn't possible to force a win, but it's possible to lose. Famously Kasparov won against J Polgar, and Jobava won it recently against a strong player. Use http://k4it.de/index.php?topic=egtb&lang=en to check any position <= 6 pieces. Pinning the knight as you did is usually a strong defense.

knighttour2

It's a draw.  If you're defending, don't put your king on the edge of the board if you can help it.  Keep the rook far from the king to give checks or pin the knight is also good.  Trading rooks draws instantly