I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...
Â
But yeah, this forum has a point
Because they have lots of people following them.
That's true , but there are some that popped out of nowhere
People making new accounts just to open their heart and speak hereÂ
Opening your heart....
That doesn't sound healthy at all.
Â
@Jackroach the guy must be getting paid a huge salary for opening hearts (get the joke or r/woosh)
It is there lose no need to criticize.Â
It is there lose no need to criticize.Â
I cannot even read what s*** u write
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.Â
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .Â
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
mad cuz bad. contrary to common opinion, bullet is depends a lot less on mouse skill and internet than it sounds.
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.Â
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .Â
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
mad cuz bad. contrary to common opinion, bullet is depends a lot less on mouse skill and internet than it sounds.
Why can't people understand that , that's not what I meant to say ?
and bullet is a great way to improve your intuition and improve your nerves under pressure
+1
My bullet is rating is 7000 rating points above my actual playing strength.
Almost everyone who has played enough bullet games has had a win under 0.01 seconds which is the most satisfying
That would be satisfying but I never got one cuz I just outright suck at bullet (and blitz at that matter)
My bullet is rating is 7000 rating points above my actual playing strength.
Lol same!
lmao it’s bullet you sold your shame long ago for the rating points now your emotionless kinda like me but I sold my soul along with my shame
Bruh I didn't understand anything
lmao it’s bullet you sold your shame long ago for the rating points now your emotionless kinda like me but I sold my soul along with my shame
the what now
Don't just tell that to kids, tell that to the adults as well.
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.Â
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .Â
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
I don't understand, aren't bullet games long? I only play bullet, and it never seems like a fast mouse has any sort of factor. Why do long games require less skill?
Like I don't know how to express about what I feel about this comment
This is your last bullet game https://www.chess.com/game/live/12600514867?username=ehmtae
Decided by 0.2 seconds, how can your brain think a quick mouse makes no difference?
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.Â
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .Â
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
I don't understand, aren't bullet games long? I only play bullet, and it never seems like a fast mouse has any sort of factor. Why do long games require less skill?
Were you high on weed while typing this ?
I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...
Â
But yeah, this forum has a point
Because they have lots of people following them.
That's true , but there are some that popped out of nowhere
People making new accounts just to open their heart and speak hereÂ
Yeah