Should we get rid of stalemate?

Sort:
blueemu
BradClooney wrote:

Look,it is simple.If your only move is into check then you lose.Just resign.

 

It's simple:

If a player is 'winning' but can't find a winning line, then they don't deserve the full point.

king_of_faluoopys

i am probably higher than class D though and i find stalemates quite anoying

falanginlaos

There are positions where one cannot put the opposition into checkmate. That's it. Thus, we have stalemates.

If 1 player is down to a king and the other has a only a king, stalemate. Check is not possible.

Same if 1 player has a king and the other has a king and 1 bishop. Checkmate is impossible. 

I'm not a good chess player but I enjoy the game. I had a king and a queen and my opponent had a king. I could not find a way to checkmate him or her. I offered a draw; it was accepted. Of course, I am a teacher and I was already 3 minutes late for class.......

Chessflyfisher

No.

king_of_faluoopys

 

king_of_faluoopys

if their is only a king and another king their is no possible mate but that counts as a Draw by insufficient mating material.

varelse1
falanginlaos wrote:

There are positions where one cannot put the opposition into checkmate. That's it. Thus, we have stalemates.

If 1 player is down to a king and the other has a only a king, stalemate. Check is not possible.

 

that's not a stalemate.

BlitzStriker07

People will play carefree if its removed .

TheCrazedCat_123

NO. How would I move if I'm in a stalemate? All I would hear is, "It's Your Move!" all day. I prefer my matches to end EVENTUALLY.

varelse1

LOL

Look what GM Eric Hansen literally JUST DID!

 

 

varelse1

The look on his face was priceless.

BradClooney

Yes,suicide the king is the only move.

varelse1

In Eric's defense,  that was a blitz game.

I've met Eric. Very nice guy.

king_of_faluoopys

but banning stalemates is only fair

king_of_faluoopys

you a rook and a queen up and the screen says stalemate i wouldn't want that

varelse1
king_of_faluoopys wrote:

but banning stalemates is only fair

No.

It is the complete opposite of "fair"

Stalemate is the cornerstone of all endgame theory. And is a very, very common result.

Those of us who have spent countless hours learning that theory are not about to throw it all out, because some beginner doesn't want to put in the work everybody else did.

 

varelse1
BradClooney wrote:

Stalemate is like you are winning a game of football by 100 points and the ref suddenly says draw.Ridiculous.

No.

That one's called "smothered mate."

king_of_faluoopys

hey i am a class C chess player and i don't like stalemates

SpacePodz
I’m fine with it. It adds a sense of challenge, even when you are way up. Makes it so the other person, if they play it right, can still win. I get why a lot of people don’t like it, but I personally think it adds to the game.
mpaetz

     The possibility of stalemate means you have to pay attention to all the little details in the position and play correctly. We wouldn't want to have to do that in chess, would we?