I love the title of this blog...."
Stockfish is WRONG, HE SUCKS
DONT ASSUME STOCKFISH'S GENDER!!!!!
Sorry dud, but take a look at my flag. I talk an actual language and most nouns have genders.
NOW THAT IS AN ACTUAL LANGAUGE, THE LANGUAGE OF THE GODS DUD, OH YEAH.
Im not fake dud, English is not even my second language, it is just a langauge I happen to know.
I know Stockfish is free, but I am really dissapointed at him.
Appart from overevaluating positions when he is supposedly calculating at 20 ply just to change his evaluation drastically after I make a move on the GUI he sucks at endgames.
Like look at this position, Stockfish is stupid enough to give only a 0.
Does that mean that you agree with me on the fact that this position is dead lost for White?
Your face is wrong.
I love the title of this blog...."
Stockfish is WRONG, HE SUCKS
DONT ASSUME STOCKFISH'S GENDER!!!!!
If it were a female engine, it would be 200 elo weaker.
ok......
Cool
I love the title of this blog...."
Stockfish is WRONG, HE SUCKS
DONT ASSUME STOCKFISH'S GENDER!!!!!
If it were a female engine, it would be 200 elo weaker.
Finally, a comment that makes sense.
#Troll
agreed. read Bronsteins posts. trying to sound like some badass Chris Rock sounding guy.
TROLL
If I ever wanted to sound like someone else it would probably be Stalin, not a comedian.
I think you are getting me wrong.
You are the ones supposed to make me laugh with your comments against my troll threads, I am not supposed to make you guys laugh with my threads.
Like seriously, are you all patzers? I actually wanted to discuss that position and the fact that Stockfish misevaluates the position. However If I said that in the title none of you would have clicked on my thread because
1- You are not humble enough to understand what Im talking about
2- You are not here for the chess
So I was forced to put that clickbait title to get your attention and so be able to discuss the position.
And Im supposed to be a troll? I bet you didnt even watch the diagrams I posted.
For example, take a look at MY FIRST THREAD EVER. In that thread I dint come in troll spirit, I was just an innocent dud thinking this would be a better version of chesspub, with more people to analyze with.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/a-very-rich-middlegame-position
What did I get? Nothing, I had to bump that thing twice just to get a binary dud to tell me he doesnt care about the openings WHEN MY OPENING ANALYSIS WAS SO DAMN RICH IN IDEAS.
Again, and Im supposed to be the troll? Open your eyes duds, YOU ARE the trolls, YOU MADE ME WHAT I AM right now.
For example, take a look at MY FIRST THREAD EVER. In that thread I dint come in troll spirit, I was just an innocent dud thinking this would be a better version of chesspub, with more people to analyze with.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/a-very-rich-middlegame-position
What did I get? Nothing, I had to bump that thing twice just to get a binary dud to tell me he doesnt care about the openings WHEN MY OPENING ANALYSIS WAS SO DAMN RICH IN IDEAS.
Again, and Im supposed to be the troll? Open your eyes duds, YOU ARE the trolls, YOU MADE ME WHAT I AM right now.
So you are telling us that trolling is infectious? Oh no! I don't want to be a troll! I must get out of this website asap.
I love the title of this blog...."
Stockfish is WRONG, HE SUCKS
DONT ASSUME STOCKFISH'S GENDER!!!!!
If it were a female engine, it would be 200 elo weaker.
Lol, come back when you have defeated a world champion in classic, or at least made into the top 100 or at the very least became (mixt) grand master.
#Judith_Poglar #Irina_Krush
If you consider the proportion of female players and their results, they are all but weaker, they just are far fewer.
I love the title of this blog...."
Stockfish is WRONG, HE SUCKS
DONT ASSUME STOCKFISH'S GENDER!!!!!
If it were a female engine, it would be 200 elo weaker.
Lol, come back when you have defeated a world champion in classic, or at least made into the top 100 or at the very least became (mixt) grand master.
#Judith_Poglar #Irina_Krush
If you consider the proportion of female players and their results, they are all but weaker, they just are far fewer.
Mmm no.
Just like women are better than men in some aspects we are also better than them in others.
Hou Yifan is the World Champion and her peak was 2658, not even 2700+.
Polgar on the other hand was probably the strongest women to be alive ,and she is pretty damn strong, however her peak rating was far away from the 2800s, her peak was 2735.
Irina Krush on the other hand, I just have one thing to say, LOL.
So far women have not proved they are as strong as men.
Women have the same opportunities as men to become GMs, there is no excuse not to become one.
If stockfish was all that bad it would be able to beat itself easily. But it clearly can't find a win against itself ergo it must be really strong. The weaker it is thought to be then the more likely it is that it should be able to beat itself and therefore the stronger it is in actuality.
Women have the same opportunities as men to become GMs, there is no excuse not to become one.
Dude, it's statistical, if there is hundred more men playing chess at high level, the number one won't be a girl. Maybe girls don't play chess as much as men because their X chromosome tell them it's uncute, maybe self confidence has something to do with size of balls, or maybe all of that is just cultural.
There probably are differences in the way brain work in either gender, but for me, it's unclear whether female are ineherently bad at chess (and we're only talking about top players), and Poglar's family tends to illustrate the opposite thesis, than education matters more than genes or gender.
Have you looked at the likely lines suggested by Stockfish after 19. Bc2?
I havent looked at the lines at all, I dont want to break my dreams, I want to believe Im better at endgames than him.