The best thread ever
Sort:
tiago is cool eh starts long threads and doesn't afraid of anything
Rael wrote:
Why is it that women can't post in threads as good as men? /oh, and all of you guys can die in a fire
Wait -- Is it the women, or the threads that aren't as good as men?
(I'm really taking this to heart.)
(And before I forget, you're a jerk too.)
sstteevveenn wrote:
It is precursed by the preceeding sentence. It is no more ambiguous than either him or her would be in an analagous sentence. Context is all important.
Don't make me invoke item three.
TheGrobe wrote:
sstteevveenn wrote:
It is precursed by the preceeding sentence. It is no more ambiguous than either him or her would be in an analagous sentence. Context is all important. Don't make me invoke item three.
lol (as per item 6)
TheGrobe wrote:
Ah... the fresh smell of useless arguments in the morning...
sstteevveenn wrote:
It is precursed by the preceeding sentence. It is no more ambiguous than either him or her would be in an analagous sentence. Context is all important.
Ah... the fresh smell of useless arguments in the morning...
Don't make me invoke item three.
Six you jerk!
(first!)
Wait...
*checks list*
That's an illegal move! Moderator!
"That's an illegal move! Moderator!"
Yes, my child?
C'mon people, you got to have something better than "jerk"...
is there any substancial thread in this forum? NO, and again NO.
Do you mean there are no threads on chess.com of any substance? Or do you mean just this one thread has no substance?
look, I don't know how you people get off saying that this thread has no substance... I mean, c'mon!!!!! it says in the title that it is the BEST... and titles are always right... Right??
LISTEN UP PEOPLE! I SHALL NOW DISS YOU ALL.
YOUR MOM!!!
YES YOU HEARD IT RIGHT!!!
bobobbob wrote:
LISTEN UP PEOPLE! I SHALL NOW DISS YOU ALL. YOUR MOM!!! YES YOU HEARD IT RIGHT!!!
This is know as the Ontologycal argumet. It not only proves the existence of God, but also the intelectual superiority of those who know it
ok...
Spelling corrections, just for Tiago.
Ontological, and intellectual. Argument. There you go. Oh, and here's the period you forgot on the end of your sentence there... .
I was going to be meaner about the whole thing, but I figure, you're Portugese, so I guess that explains it.
You call that a period? This is a period: 
Rael wrote:
Spelling corrections, just for Tiago. Ontological, and intellectual. Argument. There you go. Oh, and here's the period you forgot on the end of your sentence there... . I was going to be meaner about the whole thing, but I figure, you're Portugese, so I guess that explains it.
Auch... Nice one!!