Tyson Brady has just got his GM titled and just surpassed an ELO of 3000
Sort:
Oct 24, 2024
0
#4
"The Next Magnus" is an insult to @electrosaw's skill. He's already far surpassed Magnus
Oct 24, 2024
0
#6
They have impressive online ratings, but 2500 range is far from Magnus and 3000+ level. The only rating category this players has higher is their bullet peak rating barely over 2700 online. This is far from 3000. Troll attempt which was easily verifiable was a sad fail.
Things got tricky since most players now have got the printfoot of engine style in their play, due to:
1°) The example of top players who worked a whole lot with engines for finding new lines and variations in preparation for their games, and began increasingly to play more and more lines with weird "h4" moves very early in the game.
2°) New methods (not so new anymore these days...) of learning, involving lots of engine analysis.
These things do send a screen of smoke in front of even strong players, regarding the attempt to guess out of playstyle, if their opponent is using an engine during game, or not.
Yet, I do state cheating detection still ignore the simple fact that a 1600-1700 chess player don't happen to play suddendly a whole game (40-80 moves) at actual GM level, as in 2450-2550 without external support. Or it would then happen that 2100 players suddendly can play a whole game at 2900 level (which happend to me ONCE since I play online, and it was a rather short game).
Currently, every three Rapid tournament I play on here, has some 1600-1700 do so in all immunity despite reporting, and even so for more games in a row. Reason be the smart selection of (still winning) secondary moves proposed by the engine. For an example, if you stand at +7.00, you can pick a move that drops your advantage at +2.00, have so the "cheat detector" see you played a big bad blunder (so it'll consider you must be clean from cheating), and still win the game, for +2.00 is still a winning adavantage...
I foresee the mods not being happy about what I just wrote, and, gentlemen, I'm telling you this: fix your shayte instead of hammering us with dumb censorship.
Oct 25, 2024
0
#10
MatrixDog wrote:
He didn’t get a GM title nor surpass 3000 ;-;
Yes he did lol
Kaeldorn wrote:
Things got tricky since most players now have got the printfoot of engine style in their play, due to:
1°) The example of top players who worked a whole lot with engines for finding new lines and variations in preparation for their games, and began increasingly to play more and more lines with weird "h4" moves very early in the game.
2°) New methods (not so new anymore these days...) of learning, involving lots of engine analysis.
These things do send a screen of smoke in front of even strong players, regarding the attempt to guess out of playstyle, if their opponent is using an engine during game, or not.
Yet, I do state cheating detection still ignore the simple fact that a 1600-1700 chess player don't happen to play suddendly a whole game (40-80 moves) at actual GM level, as in 2450-2550 without external support. Or it would then happen that 2100 players suddendly can play a whole game at 2900 level (which happend to me ONCE since I play online, and it was a rather short game).
Currently, every three Rapid tournament I play on here, has some 1600-1700 do so in all immunity despite reporting, and even so for more games in a row. Reason be the smart selection of (still winning) secondary moves proposed by the engine. For an example, if you stand at +7.00, you can pick a move that drops your advantage at +2.00, have so the "cheat detector" see you played a big bad blunder (so it'll consider you must be clean from cheating), and still win the game, for +2.00 is still a winning adavantage...
I foresee the mods not being happy about what I just wrote, and, gentlemen, I'm telling you this: fix your shayte instead of hammering us with dumb censorship.
What does this have to do with anything? You are probably in the wrong topic.
Oct 25, 2024
0
#12
KeSetoKaiba wrote:
They have impressive online ratings, but 2500 range is far from Magnus and 3000+ level. The only rating category this players has higher is their bullet peak rating barely over 2700 online. This is far from 3000. Troll attempt which was easily verifiable was a sad fail.
You such a nerd get a life bro
Oct 25, 2024
0
#13
KeSetoKaiba wrote:
They have impressive online ratings, but 2500 range is far from Magnus and 3000+ level. The only rating category this players has higher is their bullet peak rating barely over 2700 online. This is far from 3000. Troll attempt which was easily verifiable was a sad fail.
🤓
So let's hear directly from electrosaw personally. Not just the little cartoon face thingy. Come on, watcha gotta say fer urself?
Oct 25, 2024
0
#16
DreamscapeHorizons wrote:
So let's hear directly from electrosaw personally. Not just the little cartoon face thingy. Come on, watcha gotta say fer urself?
FIDE awarded me the GM title once I beat Maddox Jackson in a 1v1 ultimate underground fight to the death
I agree
No one is 3000 level, stop that nonsense. Magnus holds highest blitz rating 2893.2. Chess.com ratings aren't real: deflated and distorted on low side, inflated on high side.
I Worship GOD GM Tyson Brady now, AKA @electrosaw AKA The Next Magnus