Forums

Why are Men Better than Other Men?

Sort:
trysts

Almost four years here on Chess.com and I can't remember a Man-better/woman-bad at chess thread that didn't make me want to throw up. And those threads usually have someone saying, "You're all retarded, I'm outta' here!"Laughing

corrijean

One guy (one of the newly joined chess.com members) spelled it retarted tonight. That was faintly humorous.

trysts

Laughing

electricpawn

While playing chess I will generally have a bear claw or croissant with a bracing esspresso. But when given a second pastry, I feel retarted!

jesterville

oh man...just a read on my fav site...and I can face the world again...love u all Laughing

trysts
waffllemaster wrote:

Yes, thanks you Trysts :)

As for the brain size thing, this is a good place to bring it up I suspect.

If brain size means you're smarter, then we'd have seen it in testing men only and women only.  i.e. smarter boys and men would have larger brains than less smart boys and men.  However this is of course not the case.  And so the answer to:

Why are Men Better than Other Men?

is not that "other men" have larger brains

(common knowledge for some time is the # of neural connections is more important btw)

Next time someone asks me what my I.Q. is, I'm just going to say 1144 gramsLaughing 

AndyClifton
cabadenwurt wrote:

Why ? That is indeed a good Question ! Why was Henry Ford able to produce his Model T by the millions ? Why was Sir Edmund Hillary able to climb Mount Everest ? Why was Vincent van Gogh able to paint Masterpieces ? Why was Shakespeare able to write ? Why was Mozart able to create Music ? Yes WHY is indeed the Question ( however WHAT might the Answer be ??? ).  

How fortunate you are that I am here with the answers!  Respectively:  because he owned lots and lots of factories; because he wore gloves and had a nice thick parka; because he was nuts; because he owned at least one quill pen; because he always had an ear for tunes.

gaereagdag

Some men are better than other men? Yea. I beseech you holders of the most noble Masonic 33rd level adept and his compass, that when men are better than other men, it is the metaphyical clockwork of the higher planes at work, the lower astral, the higher astral and the celestial. Just as the Masonic chequered floor alternates between light and dark, so too will men be better than other men. So saith the Lord and his higher mystical purpose for all men.

AndyClifton

I knew I never should've lent linux that Donovan album.

gaereagdag

Nah, not Donovan. You let me borrow your Captain Beefheart collection. Remember? Oh, and I stole some of your Frank Zappa records too.

AndyClifton

Then what made you go all sort of spacy on us like that?  Oh, I know:  it was this one...

AndyClifton

(An album which I actually do own btw...swear to God.)

gaereagdag

Sacrifice of the moon sounds good. Just need a muppet to sacrifice... muhahaha.

AndyClifton

I am not a muppet!  I'm how Barney looked (right as he entered detox).

ElKitch
NickYoung5 wrote:
tonydal wrote:
RainbowRising wrote:

PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS.


The chess world's humor deficiency continues...


He's got a point though, trolls have terrible table manners

if their table manners are so bad, then feeding them seems best to me :D

nameno1had

If all men were equally capable at chess or anything for that matter, contests would be pointless...

...a life without games, especially one full of people all the same would become boring and predictable.

I would rather accept that G-d endowed us all differently, inspite of, not being fond of the idea that women can out run me, are in some cases stronger than I am, or could probably even whip my @$$, in the case of martial artists...

However, I actually enjoy the idea women can beat me in chess. My wife gets angry because, when her and I try to play any games together, I have to hear about how I dominate her. I am an @$$hole because I play to win. I tried to explain that there is no point in playing a game usually if you can't ever win. If men were all the same, we'd never be able to win a game of chess and that would suck.

ivandh

Vlernt

waffllemaster

Aren't you shooting for master?  Sealed

TheGrobe
nameno1had wrote:

If all men were equally capable at chess or anything for that matter, contests would be pointless...

...a life without games, especially one full of people all the same would become boring and predictable.

Please, tell us more.

Azukikuru

If you want, I can fit a Gaussian distribution to the ratings of all men, and another to the ratings of all other men, and then we can clearly see that there is a performance difference between men and other men.