Why Resign?
Sort:
Waredude
Mar 6, 2018
0
#21
#13, I have a few times. But that is only when I really have to go do something and it can't wait a few minutes.
Yeah, i agree.
You shouldn't resign a match for just losing two pawns. You should resign when you are a rook down or queen down or when you have a forced checkmate against you.
?
It doesn't.
YouFreaking wrote:
Resign
Resign
Whine
Fine
What do you mean?
Not at all.
It's nonsense.
What are you talking about?
Chess is a game.
YouFreaking wrote:
rooks are carrots.
Please stop chatting nonsense.
Stop it.
when i think I have no more chance i resign. I do not play awaiting a mistake from my opponent. No satisfaction (because I had already lost)
Mar 8, 2018
0
#36
tomdalsan wrote:
when i think I have no more chance i resign. I do not play awaiting a mistake from my opponent. No satisfaction (because I had already lost)
Brings to mind that old sentiment - the loser in chess is not the first to blunder, but the last
Mar 8, 2018
0
#37
sree64 when you resign you have played to the end of the game. The end of the game is called RESIGNATION. Often it is the best possible move, so you rarely make the best possible move to play in games
No, your opponent could still win, but you might learn something. Like an endgame or what you could better next time
spockorm wrote:
No, your opponent could still win, but you might learn something. Like an endgame or what you could better next time
I agree with spockorm.