I just addressed the last part of ur paragraph there, in the above response actually, very easy to debunk. And again, those attribuets don't make them better suited to be leaders or take control. PERIOD.
Of course women took care of the kids while the men worked, I never said women didn't do anything, they did what they supposed to do, play the role of "SUPPORT" with their attributes that work well with a support position. But it was men that built things, not women.
This is too easy, my hardest time with you is picking which thing to refute because there are so many. My OP clearly states "exponentially advancing weapons" which you wont address. All you can focus on is that men build more things than women! This is how ridiculous you sound:
Two farmers go into business together, for the sake of the argument they are both male. Farmer A is extremely strong and good at building things, but he is not very careful, or perceptive. Farmer B is much weaker than farmer A, but he is very perceptive, caring, nurturing. Farmer A builds the fence, builds the shed, digs the irrigation canals, while farmer B plants all of the seeds, nurtures them, cares for them, makes sure they grow healthy and strong, and together they created a very successful farming operation.
Ur just resorting back to insults. This is why no one should argue with u, u won't even address anything I say, ur a waste of time. If ur argument isn't about women being leaders then why in the world did u label it that way. U've literally ignored everything i said saying it's logical fallacies when it's not.
This was an incredibly easy debate for me, not challenging in the slightest, u urself don't even know what ur talking about. If ur point isn't that women are better leaders, or anything similar to that then u've proven my point, thanks.
I've literally addressed everything you have said, with patience and understanding. I see you keep trying to pull us off on tangents though, so I will give you one last try. So far everything you have said up until this point has been proven as a logical fallacy or erroneous to the discussion.
I just addressed the last part of ur paragraph there, in the above response actually, very easy to debunk. And again, those attribuets don't make them better suited to be leaders or take control. PERIOD.
Of course women took care of the kids while the men worked, I never said women didn't do anything, they did what they supposed to do, play the role of "SUPPORT" with their attributes that work well with a support position. But it was men that built things, not women.
This is too easy, my hardest time with you is picking which thing to refute because there are so many. My OP clearly states "exponentially advancing weapons" which you wont address. All you can focus on is that men build more things than women!