I think the chess.com community is idiotic so lichess is better and rating doesn't matter at all because it's online so neither sites are accurate, but I personally prefer the lichess one
True. No community is infallible though.
I think the chess.com community is idiotic so lichess is better and rating doesn't matter at all because it's online so neither sites are accurate, but I personally prefer the lichess one
True. No community is infallible though.
I think the chess.com community is idiotic so lichess is better and rating doesn't matter at all because it's online so neither sites are accurate, but I personally prefer the lichess one
Lichess’s UI is quite clean, too.
Your entire premise is built about comparing lichess players to chess.com. It doesn't make any sense, because of the reason you yourself stated.
Why? Dude wtf. I literally gave facts. What are your grades and age? The IQ is so low. My English is A+ and I live in Canada.
Uhh… what? It seems that you are the moron here.
Your entire premise is built about comparing lichess players to chess.com. It doesn't make any sense, because of the reason you yourself stated.
Yes, I stated it. 1800 here is better than 99.3%. 2200/2300 there is better than 99.3%. The IQ...
Your stupidity…
I find the player pool on lichess to be faster, but a bit weaker, compared to the player pool at chess.com.
Over here, the players seem to be a bit slower, but a bit more accurate.
Not always, though. But as a general trend, it's what I've noticed with the opponents I've faced.
My theory is that the instant pre-moves, on lichess, has made speed more of a concern there. So blitz players there have adapted to play quicker, and to think a little less, to avoid being punished on the clock.
(This is excluding titled players, who are obviously strong on both sites.)
Your entire premise is built about comparing lichess players to chess.com. It doesn't make any sense, because of the reason you yourself stated.
Why? Dude wtf. I literally gave facts. What are your grades and age? The IQ is so low. My English is A+ and I live in Canada.
Lmao this is so cringe
Your entire premise is built about comparing lichess players to chess.com. It doesn't make any sense, because of the reason you yourself stated.
Why? Dude wtf. I literally gave facts. What are your grades and age? The IQ is so low. My English is A+ and I live in Canada.
Lmao this is so cringe
“Straight A in English”
Proceeds to provide irrelevant details that would lose points on an English essay.
Nah, I am just stating that 1800 here and 2200/2300 there is similar. The IQ...
You are an idiot! How even do you have an A in English?
Your entire premise is built about comparing lichess players to chess.com. It doesn't make any sense, because of the reason you yourself stated.
Why? Dude wtf. I literally gave facts. What are your grades and age? The IQ is so low. My English is A+ and I live in Canada.
Lmao this is so cringe
“Straight A in English”
Proceeds to provide irrelevant details that would lose points on an English essay.
Im sorry if that sounds ignorant because Im not a native English speaker but for me it looks like its easy as hell compared to other languages
For example, Portuguese has a trillion rules that makes everyone freak out
I have A in all subjects. You are an Idiot, the IQ...
Wow so you are still in kindergarten?
I have A in all subjects. You are an Idiot, the IQ...
Wow so you are still in kindergarten?
Is there now another IQ problem...
I mean than your school is not doing it's job because a guy can't argue in chess forums the whole day and get straight A+
I think there is a hole in your statements
Dude bruh. I am 1800, admit it and I will join your club and give you more members.
No you quit of you own free will. And your page says your 1200+ in daily games. rapid does not make you a strong player. Stay away
You are just upset because you don't play chess, you play variants. Also, another thing. There are player's in OTB that are better in Daily than some GMs yet they have only NM. Why? Because Rapid and Classical are chess. not Daily.
No, it's just another type of chess
That's why there are NMs that are better than GMs in it
If people time out against you you would lose no points. You will never be A Grand Master by playing 10 minute games You have a problem with the truth and reality Good Luck
See! Rapid is closer to the chess than daily.
If it's closer than what would be the true chess?
Like, the ultimate form of chess or something?
If people time out against you you would lose no points. You will never be A Grand Master by playing 10 minute games You have a problem with the truth and reality Good Luck
No, I timeout against them. Dude, you are you 6? Seriously you can be titled by playing rapid, if you and your little mind cannot comprehend what I am saying, then good luck. Even if magically what your saying is true, no one else is saying that.
I think you tell a whopper, Anybody can go to your page and see the truth.
And I have told you before how old I am you are simply lying win you say 6. I would tell you to stop but everyone is watching what you say. Are you 2Q1C
Your entire premise is built about comparing lichess players to chess.com. It doesn't make any sense, because of the reason you yourself stated.
Why? Dude wtf. I literally gave facts. What are your grades and age? The IQ is so low. My English is A+ and I live in Canada.
Ah I see. 10 years old? Ok, seeing as you are denser than a bag of potatoes, I will explain it to you. Lichess rating system is different than chess.com rating system. You said that yourself. So, it is useless to compare the two. Comprehend?
Lichess.org is the best