Don't really understand the point of your Twitter comment. For sure anyone can have it's own favourite chess game no matter his level of understanding. And I suppose the reference to agadmator refers to something she said in her streams or to a conversation the two had. What's the problem, I don't get it ?
Also I don't think there can be too much content produced, as long as there is not less quality content produced. Maybe the average quality could drop, but even that is not a given... And what matters is not the average quality but how much good contents are released.
David Llada is a journalist, enterpreneur, book worm, fixer, photographer, chess addict, gambler, media consultant, and FIDE CMO/CCO (chief marketing and communications officer).
He's a very nice guy. Sometimes a bit sarcastic ("I speak fluent sarcasm, that's my mother tongue.").
David posted the below tweet on Twiter last night. Couldn't help replying to him and a certain agadmator.
So many people are producing tons of content nowadays (books, e-books, videos) that, it seems, chess is in danger of dying of too much "competence" around.