goldendog wrote:
At best he began by presenting arguments that lead of to a conclusion of his religious view of the world, but stopping a step short of outright declaring that view. Not much difference between outright declaring those views at that point.
BTW, he was offering up his religious views and religion-oriented sites by post #8, at least.
P.S. I like Hugh Ross, as he doesn't dissemble and has good cred. Straight shooter. I can respect that.
It's obvious from the thread's title that he's trolling for a religious debate shrouded in the legitimacy of science. However when he's directly questioned about it he demures. It's a very subtle form of trolling, but trolling I say nonetheless.
At best he began by presenting arguments that lead of to a conclusion of his religious view of the world, but stopping a step short of outright declaring that view. Not much difference between outright declaring those views at that point.
BTW, he was offering up his religious views and religion-oriented sites by post #8, at least.
P.S. I like Hugh Ross, as he doesn't dissemble and has good cred. Straight shooter. I can respect that.