Actually, when we use the fossil record, we get a fairly realistic picture of how our species came to be. The current timeline is about six million years from a common ancestor (from whom apes and the humans species branched off). Although it looks like there are a lot of changes needed in terms of morphology, only a few genes govern the small differences, say, like skull structure. It’s entirely possible it happened in that timeline.
Hi I'm Yal! Ask me anything
Sort:
TerminatorC800 wrote:
Actually, when we use the fossil record, we get a fairly realistic picture of how our species came to be. The current timeline is about six million years from a common ancestor (from who ch apes and the humans species branched off). Although it looks like there are a lot of changes needed in terms of morphology, only a few genes govern the small differences, say, like skull structure. It’s entirely possible it happened in that timeline.
This originally began as a humourous bout of back slapping...now we're here debating the evolution of mankind...my head hurts...
Jan 29, 2021
0
#264
Capricorn660 wrote:
TerminatorC800 wrote:
Actually, when we use the fossil record, we get a fairly realistic picture of how our species came to be. The current timeline is about six million years from a common ancestor (from who ch apes and the humans species branched off). Although it looks like there are a lot of changes needed in terms of morphology, only a few genes govern the small differences, say, like skull structure. It’s entirely possible it happened in that timeline.
This originally began as a humourous bout of back slapping...now we're here debating the evolution of mankind...my head hurts...
Take two Advil and come back the next morning.
TerminatorC800 wrote:
Capricorn660 wrote:
TerminatorC800 wrote:
Actually, when we use the fossil record, we get a fairly realistic picture of how our species came to be. The current timeline is about six million years from a common ancestor (from who ch apes and the humans species branched off). Although it looks like there are a lot of changes needed in terms of morphology, only a few genes govern the small differences, say, like skull structure. It’s entirely possible it happened in that timeline.
This originally began as a humourous bout of back slapping...now we're here debating the evolution of mankind...my head hurts...
Take two Advil and come back the next morning.
Lol.
Jan 29, 2021
0
#266
Apes couldn't make phones, they wouldn't be smart enough. Apes couldn't invent tools, there would be no point. As far as I can tell, there is usually a change needed to evolve. The apes wouldn't need to adapt to much, so why need to evolve? Also, 6 million years I don't think is that long of a time. And we aren't sure about any details.
JackRoach wrote:
Apes couldn't make phones, they wouldn't be smart enough. Apes couldn't invent tools, there would be no point. As far as I can tell, there is usually a change needed to evolve. The apes wouldn't need to adapt to much, so why need to evolve? Also, 6 million years I don't think is that long of a time. And we aren't sure about any details.
This man...he is...big brain...
Jan 29, 2021
0
#268
I am big brain. Me brain be bigger than theze humans some peple call apes.
This man...he is also...humourous...
.................................................................................................................................................
Jan 29, 2021
0
#273
Why use dots;;; when you can use dots and commas!!;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; or use double dots!!:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
or brackets! ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Jan 29, 2021
0
#275
Brackets are not dots or commas. They will never be. They are forever inferior to dots and commas.
oh yeah...
Jan 29, 2021
0
#278
ritterfork wrote:
TerminatorC800 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
TerminatorC800 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
TerminatorC800 wrote:
Do you think you evolution is a valid possibility?
Nope.
Why is that?
Too fast. In theory I think it is possible, but I don't believe we could be here today ruling the world if 1 million years ago we were apes.
Why not? There are only a few genes that separate us from apes. Plenty of time to mutate and become human. Also, your timelines are a bit off.
Also if evolution is true morality is relative
Not necessarily. There’s such as thing as Evolutionary Creationism (EC). God-guided evolution. That’s straying a bit into religion though.
Jan 29, 2021
0
#279
ritterfork wrote:
If the Big Bang is real what happened before the Big Bang?
The Big Bang was just an outward expansion of hot matter. We have no idea how space could have spontaneously “been”, and at best, we don’t know. I have different views, but the beginning is more of a philosophy issue.
Do you think you evolution is a valid possibility?
Nope.
Why is that?
Too fast. In theory I think it is possible, but I don't believe we could be here today ruling the world if 1 million years ago we were apes.
Why not? There are only a few genes that separate us from apes. Plenty of time to mutate and become human. Also, your timelines are a bit off.
Also if evolution is true morality is relative
This is gettin' real big brain