Scrap V3.Retain V2 (with a few extra refinements) and make loads of members happy (yours truly included).It makes sense IMAO.
If you could change....

I would like to be able to play "anonymous" games, in which each player doesn't know the identity or the rating of the opponent until the game is finished. If such games could occasionally include chess engine opponents, and if one or more of the engines had defined ratings, this could also serve to calibrate the rating system; if the engines were given the same ratings while playing at different time limits, in daily vs. live chess, and even in standard chess vs. chess960 , then all of these rating systems could be calibrated to each other, and a particular number would represent the same level of chess skill in any rating category or time limit. This could make chess.com ratings more accurate measures of chess skill than OTB ratings, at least for players who choose to play a significant number of anonymous games.

I would like to be able to play "anonymous" games, in which each player doesn't know the identity or the rating of the opponent until the game is finished. If such games could occasionally include chess engine opponents, and if one or more of the engines had defined ratings, this could also serve to calibrate the rating system; if the engines were given the same ratings while playing at different time limits, in daily vs. live chess, and even in standard chess vs. chess960 , then all of these rating systems could be calibrated to each other, and a particular number would represent the same level of chess skill in any rating category or time limit. This could make chess.com ratings more accurate measures of chess skill than OTB ratings, at least for players who choose to play a significant number of anonymous games.
Thanks. That's the kind of response I was hoping to elicit. I hadn't really considered the idea before, but I like it.

...one thing about chess.com, what would that one thing be, and why that one particular thing?

...one thing about chess.com, what would that one thing be, and why that one particular thing?
Wow. You're logic is irrefutable.

I would like chess.com titles such as they have on other chess playing sites and they have or had in oldfashion postal chess.

if you have played against someone found to be cheating, you have the option to have the game and result deleted if you prefer, but leave the rating as it is as readjusting that is too complicated.

Sorting and labelling daily games.
Can you elaborate??
Having few dozen games running somehow asks for ability to sort game list by number of moves, event, opponent rating or self-defined labels. Marking the games would be also useful, grouping then into positional, in-disadvantage, difficult, and so on. Also separating tournament games into one list could be helpful.

I would like chess.com to add the option to view our next opponent profile on the portable application... if i am matc h with a guy that has 1130 rating in tactics and 1150 in bullet ... I will not play him !!! I am in the 1600-1800 rating bracket in blitzs and it happends too many time that i played games without any counter play and get crushed with almost perfect play. I know its difficult to catch all engines users but we should be able to accept or decline a specific opponent IMO -Jo- ✌️
...one thing about chess.com, what would that one thing be, and why that one particular thing?