my parents have given me chess time limit any ideas how to find out the code
parents shouldn't be too strict becahse it encourages the child to not listen and lie to do what they want. but they shouldn't neglect the fact that kids are kids, and most of the internet isn't healthy for them (experience)
But most of the negative crap on the internet is created by adults. If the news for example, was really so worried about the effect of too much media on kids, they wouldn't be putting that crap out there by a factor of a million every day. This anti-media nonsense is a "do as I say not as I do" mantra. Social media I agree in general is bad, but for everyone, not specifically kids. The internet everyone needs, even if one just wants to look a random question in Google at night before going to sleep to have peace of mind..etc.
Here's an idea. Respect the restrictions imposed by your parents and spend your time reading, listening to music and spending time with good productive people in real life.
This is absurd. Let the kids play some freakin chess if they want. Overprotection and unnecessary rules almost always do more harm than good. 95% of "music" is more brain-rotting than playing chess. Incremental limits in between games to rest your eyes/reduce stress levels is a good rule, but the crap of "no more than 2 hours of screentime/day in total" or whatever is obsessive and paranoid. About as useful as the random "age restricted" youtube/reddit posts with horrible news headlines flooding the trending searches at the same time. Anyone who sets up those kind of timers on phones or other electronic devices likely has a more unhealthy obsession with them then the kids do. I've seen people argue for 10 hours straight in YouTube comments sections (based on timestamps) about why people shouldn't have smartphones...the irony.
The restrictions aren't about limiting access to playing chess they're about limiting access to the social media side of this site/app. Look at all of the kids that complain about having chess.com restricted. Are they really interested in chess and improving at the game? No. They want the social media aspect of the site.
And it's not absurd to expect young people to read books and interact with productive humans in real life so they can learn from and gain valuable life experience from those interactions.
No, most kids are depressed due to how their problems aren't taken seriously, lack of basic human autonomy, overstressed with school, and sleep deprivation, the phone is likely just a coping mechanism, or conversely an excuse many parents defer to, to minimize those other problems. "It must be that phone". To be clear I am almost 25, and wasn't even that interested in getting a phone for the longest time (I had a gaming laptop before I had a smartphone), but this site is much more benign than mainstream social media. It is a huge percentage of kids, not like reddit/youtube/Facebook where kids get bullied by adults being called "entitled/selfish/lazy" for expressing themselves or venting about their problems. The internet is a potential lifeline for say, abused kids to look stuff up and maybe realize their home life isn't "normal" or connect to the outside world if they live in a rural area, or realize what their medical rights are if their parents are neglecting them (I know all extreme examples) but the point is I find it very hard to believe the adults who put so much effort into proving how bad social media is for kids, when they are encouraging it's use simultaneously on countless ads/websites/phone updates, are doing it out of health concerns. Seems more for pure control, like don't let the kid get exposed to anything outside what you teach them at home. That's the vibe I get from the states/Law makers that are trying to impose more and more of those restrictions (and all those states typically have a bad children's rights record as well).
Nerd #1: "I hope no bad people show up...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5rRZdiu1UE
The most important social media advice I can give is never sacrifice sleep to type comments online or check the forums. But the internet is in general a necessity and even a basic requirement for Earth to eventually become a "Type 1 Civilization".
42...was that your term paper?
No, my actual adolescent advocacy paper was almost 12 pages long. I also wrote an 8 page paper on why speed limits should be raised, but that was for a college class though.
Sleep deprivation from unreasonably early school start time, parents not taking their kids problems seriously, being too strict and unreasonable, school structure almost resembling prison, lack of basic adult autonomy for medical care/mental health treatment, those are what's actually unhealthy for kids, not whether they play 50 or 40 chess games. I'm pretty sure getting kicked off the in the middle of a game is more frustrating and will have longer lasting mental health effects than just letting them finish the game.