New in cosmology

No, your reasoning is foolish and leads you astray.

NASA communicates. This involves both video footage, diagrams and animations. Likewise, you will find dozens of videos with animations of the motion of a cannon ball or other ballistic object, which help those able to learn to calculate such things usefully. You would reason that the existence of such animations means no-one has ever competed in the shot putt. You are aware your reasoning is wrong.

Are you not capable of catching up with at least this level of knowledge?

Why are you stuck on this cannon ball thing?

Here is some simple NASA logic. 

Even if one believes NASA - 

50 years ago it took NASA 3 days to travel 239,000 miles to the moon. It takes NASA 1 day to travel 250 miles to the ISS. 

Can you not see the obvious contradictions/discrepancies? 

NASA has far too many of them to even begin to count

And what's up with this latest Artemis moon mission? I just read they are now going to put the first woman and black man on the moon ASAP! 

It just gets more absurd by the minute! 

  Is there something wrong with putting black people on the moon?

6 hours to 3 days
 
It can take anywhere from 6 hours to 3 days to get to the International Space Station, depending on the spacecraft and mission profile. It took the Apollo astronauts about three days to get to the Moon. Although the Moon is much farther away than the ISS, the Apollo spacecraft travelled more directly and quickly.

‘It takes NASA 1 day to travel 250 miles to the ISS’ googled

NASA never went to the moon and never will. Does one really believe president Nixon spoke with men on the moon 50 years ago on a rotary telephone from the oval office. Come on and think for a second and do some research/investigation into the whole Apollo moon missions hoax etc. 

https://apollomoonhoax.net/iump-register/?lid=1 

Quit making excuses for NASA. 

Someone like you who doesn't have competence in the most elementary of gravitational physics - nor can even claim to have an adequate alternative that works - is entirely unreliable on more advanced topics. 

But even so, knowing that you can regularly see giant rockets fly to enormous altitudes at stupendous speeds and thinking it is just for show shows a lack of common sense that is pathological rather than merely foolish.

NASA is not an advanced topic. NASA is Santa for adults. 

NASA Always switches to CGI/Cartoon Animations shortly after they launch rockets. 

The reason for this is not advanced but very simple. These rockets can go only so high before turning back into the earth/ocean, That is why they have their launch pads right by the ocean and that is why they ALWAYS switch to CGI/Cartoon animations and NEVER show the actual rocket allegedly going into "outer space", because they can't show something that never actually transpires. 

They claim to have satellites further out than the ISS that can zoom in and track things on earth and even read a license plate number and yet they can't follow one of their own rockets from launch to the ISS?  Think about that! 

  Well I for 1 have no problem with putting black people or yellow people or red people on the moon, or anywhere else that they wish to go to help them celebrate in the efforts.....that they contributed to...... of mankind's  progress. 

I agree. I think NASA should colonize Mars with Pygmies first in order to be fair 

No, they don't claim that.

Try to find a source that backs up your claim (rather than showing that some unreliable, non-authoritative source lied about it and you believed it).  You will fail.

[For example, here is the sort of source you might believe but you shouldn't.  The underqualified journalist who wrote this stated both that a satellite had a resolution of 31 centimeters and that it could read a number plate. He/she clearly needed to learn a lot more before being up to the job, and the same goes for his/her editor.

Hint: what does a license plate look like in a photo where the pixels are a foot wide?]

Have you not seen any alleged photos/video footage of earth from space? They claim to show hurricanes etc. from space. How difficult would it be with all these 1000's of alleged satellites in outer space to capture footage of these alleged rockets blasting off and traveling to the ISS uncut/unedited?

NASA/ISS claims to show the earth spinning 24/7. 

As I stated already, quit making excuses for NASA or NASA shall continue to deceive you! 

Do some serious research into NASA and you will discover their occult origins i.e. Crowley, Parsons, Hubbard etc. Heck just look at their logos, one would have a difficult time trying to explain away their occult messages/meanings. 

Hurricanes are hundreds of miles wide - a rocket is tiny in comparison. If your dog runs through the house, you can watch where it goes, but it's much harder to track a flying insect when you've got fly swatter in your hand.

Satellites aren't put into space to watch rocket launches: they're owned by different organisations and put there for specific reasons, like relaying television and telephone signals. And it's not like the ones that do have cameras can point them in any direction: they've got a field of vision and can only see what's in that cone.

And who's going to watch a 6 hours to 3 day unedited video of a rocket flight to the international space station? Of course it's edited.

I think it's amazing that Elroch is still letting post your drivel in this thread: it's scientific denialism like yours that exacerbated the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and why the US had one of the highest rates of death per capita despite being one of the wealthiest countries per capita.

David - NASA claims to have satellites/telescopes that see trillions of miles/ "light years" away. Yet they cannot track one of their own rockets a mere 250 miles from earth.

And of course anyone can see from your post you are Anti-Freedom/Anti-Free Speech. 

Quit making excuses for NASA and please.. and I implore you to stop believing everything you see/hear via TV/MSM! 

Hold a magnifying glass up to your eye: it helps you see things far away much better. But then try and swing that around and look at things closer to you, and you get disoriented really easily. And the telescopes mounted on satellite (they are different things, you know) are looking outwards into space, not back towards the earth. You're basically saying that when I'm standing on my roof looking at the sky that I should be able to see the car pulling into my garage. It makes no sense.

I'm not calling for you to be tarred & feathered - I'm just saying that you're not contributing anything useful to this thread except to demonstrate the curious phenomenon of a person claiming to be open-minded yet rejecting evidence that does not fit their world view. And misinterpeting things as basic as aeroplanes and cannon balls and parabolic motion. And a flat earth, seriously?

  No, he lives his life in denial, fear, superstition, myths, fantasy, mistrust, and delusions.