"people attack Fox on the fact that they are very biased and are basically the white house channel"
Hey hey hey, read the post correctly! The fact that you expected it doesn't have to make you distort my post to fit your expectations. 
News: Where do you get it?
Sort:
Oct 2, 2007
0
#22
jay wrote: hahaha, now THAT is classic. :) That's what I expected to here Etienne, a rip on fox followed by admitting that you don't watch it. At least the shows I dislike I've spent a lot of time watching it for myself to come to that conclusion first.
Oct 2, 2007
0
#23
I don't think they are very biased or the white house channel. I'm not sure what you're saying here. :( How did I distort? It sounds like you ripped the channel (sayings it biased) and then said you don't watch it. Maybe you weren't trying to rip it, but that's how it sounded (read).
Oct 2, 2007
0
#24
Hmm yes maybe the second part might sound ambiguous, although with the fact that I said "people..." it seems to me like it should exclude, or at least give a neutral stance to the speaker, no?
Faux News is always entertaining.