I remember reading about this when I was in 5th grade... but it was not even close to as concise wording as you have put. I am not sure why this has not gotten more comments, I think it is because it is not a discussion question- it is a statement that it is not easy to respond to.
Unified Model of the Universe

I don't understand ANYTHING. Maybe it's because I'm into metaphysics, so we use a completely different language.

I don't believe this thread age is 4 years old.It seems that some terms are not familiar being used in 4 years ago.Even the "spagettified" was proposed in main thread as old as less than 4 years ago ? I apologize if there is faulty in me.

The Higgs Field does not create matter, it merely gives certain particles a property we call mass.
There has to be some energy loss according to the second law of thermodynamics.
All galaxies are moving away from all other galaxies, apart from those that are very close and so interact very strongly via gravity. From our frame of reference, all galaxies are moving away from us. We cannot say that we are moving from our frame of reference. Also, we wouldn't be able to move away from all the galaxies while they remain still. We would be moving away from some and towards others. We know what redshift is caused by, it is caused by an object moving further away relative to the observer,Ike the change in pitch of a car's engine.
We have a much larger and older Stable Universe than 13.8 billion years with areas of contraction (galaxies) and expansion (voids).
Mass is squeezed out of existance at the centre of Stars and through wormholes re-emerges in the voids via white holes which could be in other universes in the form of fundamental particles where there is the least resistance to re-entry.
The particles and elements interact with the radiation and heavier elements leached from the areas of galaxies around them and start to create Matter (Hydrogen) through the Higgs Field /Mechanism.
This process continues until the new mass in the voids starts to collapse into stars and galaxies. The galaxies eventually leach away all of their energy and mass and become voids which starts the whole process again with no energy loss so goes on ad infinitum.
The Red Shift is mainly due to Light's frequency being 'spagettified' when it leaves it's gravity well and galaxies collapsing not gallaxies moving away from us. In effect, it is us who are moving away from them!
The above description of the Unified Model Of The Universe is highly speculative. The Thurston Geometric Theorem as proven by Grigori Perelman 3 yrs. ago. This mathematical proof asserts that without exception it is impossible to determine the shape of the universe.

We have a much larger and older Stable Universe than 13.8 billion years with areas of contraction (galaxies) and expansion (voids).
Mass is squeezed out of existance at the centre of Stars and through wormholes re-emerges in the voids via white holes which could be in other universes in the form of fundamental particles where there is the least resistance to re-entry.
The particles and elements interact with the radiation and heavier elements leached from the areas of galaxies around them and start to create Matter (Hydrogen) through the Higgs Field /Mechanism.
This process continues until the new mass in the voids starts to collapse into stars and galaxies. The galaxies eventually leach away all of their energy and mass and become voids which starts the whole process again with no energy loss so goes on ad infinitum.
The Red Shift is mainly due to Light's frequency being 'spagettified' when it leaves it's gravity well and galaxies collapsing not gallaxies moving away from us. In effect, it is us who are moving away from them!
The above description of the Unified Model Of The Universe is highly speculative. The Thurston Geometric Theorem as proven by Grigori Perelman 3 yrs. ago. This mathematical proof asserts that without exception it is impossible to determine the shape of the universe.
It's not impossible. It's been done using the CMBR and trigonometry
brumtown wrote:
It's not impossible. It's been done using the CMBR and trigonometry.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
A cryptic little note about an unpoven CMBR and a crutch with trigonometry versus the PERELMAN proof including singularities of the Thurston Geometric Theorem.

Einstein himself NEVER SUGGESTED anything about White Holes. [as the OP states]. The discussed theory is BASED on equations from Einsteins Theory of Relativity. [To which practically any new theory stakes it's claim.]

Loop quantum gravity—a theory that extends general relativity by quantizing spacetime—predicts that black holes evolve into white holes.
This is NOT a Unified Model of the Universe.
Your imagination is falling off the deep end again, with this new theory, going to places the theory never intended to go.
This is what ... your 4th thread on the same ole, same ole?
Mass is squeezed out of existance at the centre of Black Holes and through wormholes re-emerges in the voids via (white holes) where there is the least resistance to re-entry.
It totally got the lack of recognition that it deserved.