This forum is for people who don't believe in evolution and have evidence

I just don't like how you guys pretend yours is science 

All the evidence points to evolution. It's the cornerstone of modern biology.

No it doesn't. And to bad about that second thing because it does not make evolution correct. Just ruins modern biology 

Proof only happens in mathematics, the best we can do outside of that is having a huge amount of evidence. Evolution has a huge amount of evidence. You might as well say you don't believe in gravity... which is why many Christians simply say God created evolution.

In any case, you ask so many questions and are able to stay calm while reading different points of view... I suspect your faith wont last into your 20s. To be frank, faith is more suited to the emotional and stupid and that doesn't seem to be you.

(Of course some very smart people are believers, I'm just saying what I guess might happen)

I guess that's not totally accurate... it's stupid to pretend people of different beliefs are inherently stupid.

But still, I think at the very least a more rationally inclined person wont stick with fundamentalism of any sort. You can believe in God all you want, but I'll change my guess to you'll at least find a way to reconcile modern science with your belief in God (as many people have already done).

No evidence for creationism and no evidence for evolution? Does that mean that human existence remains a mystery, something yet to be discovered?

And other life forms, not just humans.

The bunny feels compelled to repeat 

No, not for me anyway. I think most of the other people on this forum have made up there minds too. You can believe something with out proof. I do and so do evolutionists 

It’s definitely true that people can believe something without proof. But you have said countless number of times that there is no evidence for evolution when there actually is. There are a countless number of scientific journals that show evidence of evolution. I have evidence that I can think of at the top of my head:


In some areas of the world, moth species darkened in color over the years as the tree bark darkened from pollution. This happened because the lighter moths were easily discovered by predators, so the darker moths were the ones that survived and were able to reproduce.

A handful of bacteria species have become resistant to antibiotics after being exposed to the antibiotics for many years. This is because the ones that were killed by the bacteria were unable to reproduce.

People with mainly African ancestry having darker skin color than people with mainly European ancestry as adaptations from having more sun exposure for many generations. A person can get skin cancer from getting too much sun exposure and can die young enough to not reproduce.

Penguins have adapted their coloring to their environment. When they swim, their white bellies when seen from underwater blends in the sky so that they can be safe from predators (or not be seen by prey), and their black backs, when seen from above, blends in with the dark ocean. Had the population not adapted this way, the penguins might not have survived because they need food and to be safe from predators in order to survive.

Female peacocks find it quite sexy when male peacocks show their huge, colorful feathers, and because of that, the beautiful colored male peacocks “get lucky” and are able to pass down their traits to their offspring. Had this not happened, male peacocks would not have their big, colorful feathers, because the male peacocks with tiny, ugly feathers would not have passed their traits to their future generations.

I can probably think of some more, but I feel like I’ve said enough.

Nothing (outside of maths) has proof. The theory of gravity doesn't have proof, it just has overwhelming evidence.

Same for the theory of evolution.

It happens to clash with your preconceived ideas, so you dislike it, but your distaste doesn't make it any less well supported by evidence.

I meant “ugly feathers would have,” not “ugly feathers would not have.”

#532

+1

I would have suggested that someone disprove the theory of gravity by jumping out of their high rise apartment but this being chess.com, someone might actually take me seriously.   Please don't. 

Note that the title of your forum desperately looks for support for what happens to be an erroneous viewpoint. Your problem is that the huge amount of evidence of all types is exactly what makes the theory of evolution so well established as a cornerstone of biology - it's the biologists who tell me this. You want to ignore it and find something to support your denial of the science.

This is the first of a series of questions by someone who has very poor understanding of the relevant science, from which he apparently draws conclusions about an unconnected science.

Gravity makes stuff orbit. This is what happens to the stuff that makes up the galaxy. Is this so difficult? The distribution of dark matter is the reason the arms still exist (this is difficult, but the calculations have been done).

Since we are on page 27 of a forum looking for "proof against evaluation", on which page can I find the evidence the title was seeking?

Hi elroch, if I was like you I would  block you but I'm actually gads you joined us. Also I don't need to prove anything, look back in your own forum and find my posts and see for yourself. Glad you joined us

Unfortunately, there's been religious discussion that the OP has not only failed to warn against but also participated in, so I am now locking this thread.

David, moderator