Chess Changes???
Sort:
Amazing! Game on.
chabeck wrote:
erik wrote:
whims? you think running Chess.com is done whimsically? interesting.
Although I would also like to see avg ratings return, I would suggest chess.com staff ignore comments by users that are obviously innapropriate in tone and disrespectful of the hard work that has been done to this fine site.
Cudos to the staff.
Here is the game between Mati Saastamoinen & Chabeck. Not worth looking at Mati Saastamoinen wins by resignation after 26 moves
FEN:
The main event Game between myself, Mati Saastamoinen & Larsera is still in progress.
Mar 22, 2011
0
#64
MatiSaastamoinen wrote:
The main event Game between myself, Mati Saastamoinen & Larsera is still in progress.
no doubt a breathless world awaits the outcome....
MatiSaastamoinen wrote:
chabeck wrote:
erik wrote:
whims? you think running Chess.com is done whimsically? interesting.
Although I would also like to see avg ratings return, I would suggest chess.com staff ignore comments by users that are obviously innapropriate in tone and disrespectful of the hard work that has been done to this fine site.
Cudos to the staff.
Here is the game between Mati Saastamoinen & Chabeck. Not worth looking at Mati Saastamoinen wins by resignation after 26 moves
FEN:
I'm not sure what this information does for your argument. I'm an 1100 level player and you challenged me to a game, negating your contention that you prefer players over 1600.
Mar 22, 2011
0
#66
YO ERIK !
you said you knew how to fix it, when are you gonna get round to fixing it then?
Chess.com is a great site but if you dont pull ya finger out Im not renewing my membership.
you ve got until April
I only expect Erik to follow his own rational self-interests more than the random demands of context-droppers.
Erik, I won't even say to keep up the good work, as you yourself would already want that more than me.
In the meantime, I am going to enjoy the features of this excellent site.
Cheers.
Mar 22, 2011
0
#68
Timotheous wrote:
I only expect Erik to follow his own rational self-interests more than the random demands of context-droppers.
Erik, I won't even say to keep up the good work, as you yourself would already want that more than me.
In the meantime, I am going to enjoy the features of this excellent site.
Cheers.
:)
My life would improve if the features got much worse..... I'm a bit addicted to the site.
Mar 22, 2011
0
#71
Mithras wrote:
+1
YO ERIK!
take your time mate
Indeed. I'm imagining my opponent is less average than he is ...
"while the stat's away, the muse will play"
Erik, maybe your programmers are not storing the information as neatly as they could under the mainframe of the server, just a tip. I changed my proggramers and turned out to by quite helpful-
chabeck wrote:
MatiSaastamoinen wrote:
chabeck wrote:
erik wrote:
whims? you think running Chess.com is done whimsically? interesting.
Although I would also like to see avg ratings return, I would suggest chess.com staff ignore comments by users that are obviously innapropriate in tone and disrespectful of the hard work that has been done to this fine site.
Cudos to the staff.
Here is the game between Mati Saastamoinen & Chabeck. Not worth looking at Mati Saastamoinen wins by resignation after 26 moves
FEN:
I'm not sure what this information does for your argument. I'm an 1100 level player and you challenged me to a game, negating your contention that you prefer players over 1600.
You are observant, id did say i "prefer" playing +1600. And if the stats return you will see my average opponent is 1630. I challenged you simply because you attempted to insult me. I was curious as to the "type" of player such a remark issued from. gg.
Heres my game against Larsera. I played with Balck. White resigned after 38 moves.
FEN:
You are observant, id did say i "prefer" playing +1600. And if the stats return you will see my average opponent is 1630. I challenged you simply because you attempted to insult me. I was curious as to the "type" of player such a remark issued from. gg.
You take a rather narcissitic view of my intentions. The intention of my initial post was to suggest that erik ignore comments by those people who seem overly rude. Maybe you view yourself as rude, but the comment was directed towards the general dismal tone of the thread.
Whatever the intent of your initial post, I was responding to the later;
"I'm not sure what this information does for your argument. I'm an 1100 level player and you challenged me to a game, negating your contention that you prefer players over 1600. "
Lets keep this conversation linear, easier to follow
An intense battle prior to the 33rd indeed. GG, look forward to our games to come. Well played Larsera!
MatiSaastamoinen wrote:
Whatever the intent of your initial post, I was responding to the later;
"I'm not sure what this information does for your argument. I'm an 1100 level player and you challenged me to a game, negating your contention that you prefer players over 1600. "
Lets keep this conversation linear, easier to follow
Okay, let's keep it linear. You said "I challenged you because you attempted to insult me." If the insult you refer to is that which you quote from me above, then you don't know what linear means.