The four moves rule avoids the rating inflation that could happen with guys that sudenly win a lot of games by early timeouts.
So, now my opponent can time out and he wins?
I thought I was the winner in those cases!
You missed what I said.
I was talking about people that win too much games when the oponents time out a lot.
I didn't miss it, my response was intended to be sarcastic. Don't you lose when you run out of time?
Seems to me that those who timeout SHOULD lose and the player who did not time out is the winner(if sufficient material is present of course).
That's how it should be unless maybe you're proposing a new chess rule (we have lots of threads like that).
I'm soooooooooooooo confused!
When someone times out on the first move they still lose the game. Just the rating doesn't change.
There are lot of people here and everyday several of them sudenly stop playing. This may happen because they lost the interest or even because they died, whatever.
Somitimes in a tournament there is a higher rated one that starts to timeout all the games, giving people a great rating increment. Then the second game with that person starts automaticaly, and they time out on move one. Chess.com doesn't let this one move game to inflate even more the rating of the lucky oponent, but the victory is awarded to him, anyway.
obviously we just need an "I'm an idiot and/or a jerk" option that all the idiots/jerks can check off. then the rest of the good people can simply avoid them.
trigs
Kevin
Hamilton, Canada
0 new
My Email: 0 new
My Referrals: 1
My Points: 1895
My Status: Click to set your status
I'm an Idiot and/or a Jerk: Yes