There's been some discussion about the banner ad that appeared today on chess.com, with a number of Members complaining that this violates the spirit, if not the letter, of their paid membership agreements. I thought it might be worthwhile to create a Forum topic to air these concerns, and to discuss more generally the issue of a paid course on chess.com.
When I first heard about "Chess.com University," my immediate reaction was, "Wow, $300 per course is too rich for my blood, but I wish chess.com and IM Pruess well." But on further reflection, I'm siding with those who have expressed concerns. Is this the first step down a "slippery slope" where the "good stuff" on chess.com cost extra, and we'll see more and more of today's free services moved behind a paid firewall?
I have deep respect for IM Pruess, and I do wish him well. But with all respect, does this course really require that much more effort/time/creativity than the various Chess Mentor courses, instructional videos, articles, etc., etc. that are offered for "free" to subscribers? I'm not saying that IM Pruess shouldn't be paid handsomely for his expertise and attention -- he most definitely should. But I think that he should be paid out of chess.com's subscriber revenues, just as the other course/video/article providers are. (Of course, chess.com would probably choose to pay IM Pruess significantly more for his courses than they pay, e.g., an article writer; but that's a different conversation.)
Bottom line, although I was very positive toward this new program at first, I now feel that we Members should rise up and say NO PAID COURSES ON CHESS.COM!!
I hope you all find these thoughts provocative, if not agreeable. I'd love to hear what you think.
Thanks for listening,
ibiwisi/Michael