You take the risk and you lose
Blunder Chess.
Well it does decrease your average centipawn loss by that checkmate and end the game, that means you can get a better accuracy. You need to play like a master, the blunder master.
You want to have the least accuracy. If you have a chance to checkmate, that only gives you one good move so if you made a lot of blunders before hand, (and more than your opponent), you'll win even if your opponent gets checkmated.
You want to have the least accuracy. If you have a chance to checkmate, that only gives you one good move so if you made a lot of blunders before hand, (and more than your opponent), you'll win even if your opponent gets checkmated.
That decreases the avg centipawn loss
it increases your accuracy. Your idea here is to make the least mistakes ( i mean, non blunder) to get a clear shot
umm.. the point of chess is to checkmate, not blunder. Anyway here is a opening recommended for that variant of yours


https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/34831770.aa33edcf.50x50o.80c2aab4d5e6@2x.jpeg 2x" alt="34831770.aa33edcf.50x50o.80c2aab4d5e6.jpeg" />
https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/user/30406802.2c827e50.50x50o.9ab84d29888f@2x.gif 2x" alt="30406802.2c827e50.50x50o.9ab84d29888f.gif" />
Good point. We stalemated. But a good strategy is to checkmate when you think you're ahead in blunders.
but checkmating wouldnt be a blunder?