Chess.com Forums: The battleground of trolls and idiots! - Chess Forums - Page 2

SHWETA_BENIWAL

May 18, 2016

0

#21

SilentKnighte5 wrote:

So which one are you?

..

BlargDragon

May 18, 2016

0

#22

thegreat_patzer wrote:

there was a list.

No Blarg you weren't there. or at least I didn't see you.

sorry charlie... perhaps it was just a hard list to make and include every whacky guy.

if I had to name every guy from the forums that I've read and occasionally enjoyed (well in her case I guess she Didn't enjoy them, did she?)...

I'm sure I would miss people.

I figured I probably wasn't on it since I'm able to comment. But yeah, these are big forums and it's hard to keep track of everyone. I also don't deliberately try to get on people's bad side--it just kind of happens. And that sounds kind of incriminating, I admit.

gerberk

May 18, 2016

0

#23

Marry me SHWETA.

thegreat_patzer

May 18, 2016

0

#24

SHWETA_BENIWAL wrote:

thegreat_patzer wrote:

the List is gone. apparently this is more of a philosophical discussion.

huh,

sorry OP I don't know what that means. I don't read chinese.

from a photo, I don't even think I can translate it.

thegreat_patzer

May 18, 2016

0

#25

gerberk wrote:

Marry me SHWETA.

Now, you WERE on the list.

and I wonder why. LOL.

SHWETA_BENIWAL

May 18, 2016

0

#26

gerberk wrote:

Marry me SHWETA.

SHWETA_BENIWAL

May 18, 2016

0

#27

thegreat_patzer wrote:

gerberk wrote:

Marry me SHWETA.

Now, you WERE on the list.

and I wonder why. LOL.

thegreat_patzer

May 18, 2016

0

#28

Sincerely, the story of my chess.com Life. yes. Good post.

thegreat_patzer

May 18, 2016

0

#29

I liked the Misunderestimated quote- but ...

ok. wow! you like edit your posts ALOT!

SHWETA_BENIWAL

May 18, 2016

0

#30

thegreat_patzer wrote:

Sincerely, the story of my chess.com Life. yes. Good post.

NM ozzie_c_cobblepot

May 18, 2016

0

#31

So what's the current theoretical status of the Slav Exchange?

BlargDragon

May 18, 2016

0

#32

ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

So what's the current theoretical status of the Slav Exchange?

It changed its Facebook relationship status to "It's complicated" so now I'm worried.

SHWETA_BENIWAL

May 18, 2016

0

#33

thegreat_patzer wrote:

I liked the Misunderestimated quote- but ...

ok. wow! you like edit your posts ALOT!

NM ozzie_c_cobblepot

May 18, 2016

0

#34

Whip_Kitten wrote:

ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

So what's the current theoretical status of the Slav Exchange?

Careful, lest you be considered a troll on this thread. ;)

LV, It's always been my type of opening anyway. People should be glad that I don't play 1.e4, because I would probably play the French Exchange too. And it seems like there's a new thread on that every day now.

The point of chess is to suck the entire life out of the position and then win.

ArgoNavis

May 18, 2016

0

#35

Wow!

A troll makes a thread to criticize trolls!

Team Irony!!!

batgirl

May 18, 2016

0

#36

There are indeed pointless threads, insipid threads, silly threads and even malicious threads, but there are also interesting threads, educational threads and worthwhile threads. To say there are only useless threads is terribly unjust and inaccurate. The nonsense threads do get the most attention, maybe because they are easier. But even in those thread we get clever and thought-provoking comments quite often. Chess.com is a mix of people, a mix of minds and a mix of topics. With the exception of malicious threads, I, personally, wouldn't want it any other way.

ArgoNavis

May 18, 2016

0

#37

Malicious threads?

As in malicious software?

BlargDragon

May 18, 2016

0

#38

kingofshedinjas wrote:

Malicious threads?

As in malicious software?

No, like polyester in a garment that says it's 100% cotton.

SHWETA_BENIWAL

May 18, 2016

0

#39

Whip_Kitten wrote:

ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

So what's the current theoretical status of the Slav Exchange?

Careful, lest you be considered a troll on this thread. ;)

Very funny & sweet warning lol :)

ArgoNavis

May 18, 2016

0

#40

BlargDragon escribió:

kingofshedinjas wrote:

Malicious threads?

As in malicious software?

No, like polyester in a garment that says it's 100% cotton.

That's not a problem

But you could get in trouble if you sold a garment that says it's 100% polyester and ends up to contain cotton.