Chess.com really said that it was a 1400.
Thats better than me 
Greatest game
Sort:
looking at that game gave me chlamydia
Lol
They got danny as their accuracy on game review, bravo
Jul 24, 2023
0
#6
Bravo indeed. A wise man once said that when numbers fail to show how much of a failure you are there is Danny’s face
I can't post a game against Nelson (real person : Nelson Mandela) according to the review, i played like a expert, 2150!!!
I think chess.com's rating estimate is based on your current elo. I say that because there was a game where I played with about 95% accuracy and chess.com said I played like a 1200-rated player. When I play with 75% accuracy chess.com says I play like a 400-rated player. (my current rating is 900). But when these 2000-rated guys play with -1% accuracy, chess.com thinks they play like a 1400-rated player. Chess.com should really change its elo-estimation system.
And of course you got a brilliant in there somehow.
Game review in shambles
https://www.chess.com/game/live/83470592945