97.0 Accuracy in 10 moves game !!

Sort:
1d31-O

FizzyBand

Not to be that guy, but a 97, particularly in a 10 move game is not really that impressive. I got a 99.6 on a 20+ move game, but it was mostly theory so once again it’s not that impressive.

pinkblueecho

Nice win!

pinkblueecho
Tharuka123456 hat geschrieben:

Bc5 really lost the game for him 

 

Well done to the OP for spotting the tactic though.

pinkblueecho
Tharuka123456 hat geschrieben:
pinkblueecho wrote:
Tharuka123456 hat geschrieben:

Bc5 really lost the game for him 

 

Well done to the OP for spotting the tactic though.

I was white 😑🤦🏻‍♂️😂

 

I´m not sure why you´re using face palms and impolite emojis. I know you were white. Black played Bc5 leading to you playing Qh5 forking the King and bishop. I said well done for spotting that tactic and then you facepalm me?

I was trying to be really supportive and you decided to be toxic.  Fine, be that way. Let me concur with the statement that a 97, particularly in a 10 move game, is really NOT that impressive.

baddogno

OP  Original Poster

Sollieman83

lol

Vibhansh_Alok

I got 99.7 in 8 moves

Vibhansh_Alok
Vibhansh_Alok wrote:

I got 99.7 in 8 moves

 

Here's the game

 

Ostolopov_Yaroslav
Мне понравилось как ты играешь
FizzyBand
Roastinator123 wrote:
FizzyBand wrote:

Not to be that guy, but a 97, particularly in a 10 move game is not really that impressive. I got a 99.6 on a 20+ move game, but it was mostly theory so once again it’s not that impressive.

Was it the dragon game?

It was a Dragon game, but probably not the one you’re thinking of

BlindThief
Tharuka123456 wrote:
FizzyBand wrote:

Not to be that guy, but a 97, particularly in a 10 move game is not really that impressive. I got a 99.6 on a 20+ move game, but it was mostly theory so once again it’s not that impressive.

BTW you are 2200+ I’m just 1300

A fair observation, which is why nobody should put too much stock in those scores. Not that 97 isn’t impressive (it is, and congratulations), but if your opponent plays well then you’re more likely to make the mistakes that drag it down. If your opponent plays poorly, you’re more likely to get a higher score. I’ve seen 2000+ rated players with games in the 30s, and I’ve had probably 100 games with scores over 95. It’s a good, albeit flawed, heuristic 

AyushBlundersAgain
Tharuka123456 wrote:
FizzyBand wrote:

Not to be that guy, but a 97, particularly in a 10 move game is not really that impressive. I got a 99.6 on a 20+ move game, but it was mostly theory so once again it’s not that impressive.

BTW you are 2200+ I’m just 1300

Well any idiot can memorize the Legal's Mate and memorize the move sequences and have a 99 CAPS after a 6 move mate. Doesn't make them a great player.

anan2010

 

shravan1564

In a 30 move Grunfeld defence game I had accuracy of 99.6 which even I couldn't believe

 

 

sndeww

Bruh I had a 99.9 game before.

 

every move was book move.