I played a very strong team once. [their top player is now #2 in the USA in correspondence chess]
The game lasted 1 year. If you responded the same day that you recieved a move--it counted as no time. They would think and do emails back and forth for a week or more and send a move and then they would get a move right back and then have to start all over. After a while this was very difficult for them and they started taking vacation time and un authorized time outs.
The tournament director [I should same game director] told them they had exceeded the time limit [7 days for a move] but then they told him it was THEIR game and they could change the time limits. I did not object at all as I felt I was winning. When the game finished they had taken more than 300 days of time to my 1 day.
Very impressive ponz. It does take a different set of skill than live chess for sure. This was my first correspondence tourney having to deal with 9 different chess players who moved at different rates. It def. is a new experience.
Don't do what I'm doing--get caught up in playing too many games. It's easy to,do,and seems fun but even with a few days between moves, those games can and will pile up on you and blunders will happen. Good on you for asking for help and its frankly nice to see the constructive replies. The trolls must be on vacation. 😄
Yeah I know what you mean. The key is "regulation". A reasonable handful to start with, then when some are coming to an end I create new ones. It looks like you've got loads on the go but really they're all just regulated that's the key. I'm trying to reduce my games to zero so I can enter a tourney here, I havn't done one yet.