Daeth Opining: The Future of Chess?
Sort:
[COMMENT DELETED]
This entire post is bogus; Its based upon a thread that was deleted 7 yrs ago, by a man named Sunny Jim, and the title of HIS thread was, "Man vs. Machinery.
It is more directly based on the works of the legendary messiah, daeth, who invinted his opining :)
Addicted-to-Chess97 wrote:
I FRIGGIN FOUND IT!!!!!!
SOSOSOSOS OOOOOO HAPYPYPYPYPPP!PP!P!P!P WHWHWOHOOO !
WHOAH! Chess.com removed my link?!
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/wayback-machine-on-chesscom?page=1
dateh is garbage. why bother?
EDB123 wrote:
dateh is garbage. why bother?
you don't understand just how much of a legend he is on chess.com...
here is a great daeth game... www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/a-daeth-game-to-remember?lc=1#last_comment
macer75 wrote:
UPDATE:
I just received a reply from Borislav Ivanov. Here's what he said:
Houdini declare that white in the opening is play slightly inaccurate. However, I have beat against Houdini so many times, so what it say not important. I think it is very good opening.
I also showed the game and my findings to a Chinese friend of mine, and he sent the game to Hou Yifan. Soon thereafter I received a reply from her, and she said:
这个开局看上去很有意思。第一眼看上去白方的下法有些问题，但经过仔细考虑之后，我想不出来黑方能够怎样利用这些问题使自己占有优势。我还需要更仔细地研究才能得出一个明确的结论。不过我很惊讶为什么自己和前辈的大师们从来就没有想到过可以这样开局。
According to Google translate, here's what she said:
The start looks very interesting. White dismount first glance some of the problems, but after careful consideration, I have no idea how to use the black side of these issues can make your own advantage. I also need to be studied more carefully in order to come to a clear conclusion. But I am surprised why the gurus themselves and their predecessors had never thought of it can be start.
I haven't received any other replies yet, but both of these experts think that the opening is worthy of further consideration, and I'm sure that the other guys I sent the game to will think the same, if they actually take the time to sit down and think about it. I just hope that they don't think so highly of themselves that they won't eve consider taking suggestions from a lowly patzer like myself.
I bolded the words in hi original post... ROFLMFAO
Yep. This is a thread of trolls, by trolls, for trolls. Very awsome
Hey Guys,
Just letting you know, so you don't offend the Chess Informant that officially names opening or anything, the lines 1.d4 d5 2.h4 and 1.e4 e5 2.h4 are already classified as part of the Anti-Borg, or Desprez Opening. See http://www.365chess.com/view_game.php?g=838610, http://www.365chess.com/view_game.php?g=1248309, http://www.365chess.com/view_game.php?g=2163900 as some examples. t's more common to see 1.h4 first and then transpose. But most lines with early h4 are still considered the Desprez.
However, there isn't a name for it if black doesn't eventually counter with a symmetrical structure. Say, in the caro-kann defense, there's no name. So you can call it the daeth there!
OP looks like Daeth, warmed up.
Such junk openings aren't good for one's chess development and are too gimmicky. Better just to follow opening principles and not create unnecessary weaknesses. 1.f4 is suboptimal as 1.d4 does everything it does while preparing development and not weakening the king, but it still isn't a junk opening as there's still some central control. Sure after 1.d4 black can prepare to bop at the d-pawn later with ...c5, but this doesn't negate 1.d4 overall strengths over 1.f4.
1.h4 on the other hand does nothing and hands black a free hand in the center while weakening the kingside and taking a potential h3 off the table. Black didn't commit to a kingside fianchetto and probably won't. 1.Nc3,g6 2.h4 is possible, but black already made a commitment.
I have just invinted an opining, that I made in honor of Daeth. This great opining only comes once in a mouseslip.
Chessman265 wrote:
I have just invinted an opining, that I made in honor of Daeth. This great opining only comes once in a mouseslip.
The opening is winning because the opponent is laughing so hard that he runs out of time.
这个开局看上去很有意思。第一眼看上去白方的下法有些问题，但经过仔细考虑之后，我想不出来黑方能够怎样利用这些问题使自己占有优势。我还需要更仔细地研究才能得出一个明确的结论。不过我很惊讶为什么自己和前辈的大师们从来就没有想到过可以这样开局
Who made that up for you?
[COMMENT DELETED]
