How bad is a 640 rating

Sort:
Avatar of Rocky-149

bro it chess is complex

 

Avatar of Sadlone

Quite awful and a bit embarrassing as well

Avatar of Ziryab
Jacer34 wrote:
Having played chess for a combined period of a year (several decades ago) and having joined a couple chess.com a couple of weeks ago my rating is now around 630-650. If the standard ELO rating for beginners is about 800 this means that I am playing to a standard worse than an absolute beginner! The weird thing is I have played a few good games with people around the 600-700 range and each of us seem to have a grasp of the basics of the game and tactics - eg planning ahead with defence and attack and implementing forks, pins etc and knowing how to finish. Is the rating on chess.com different or are all if us at my level simply catastrophically awful?

Everyone starts as a beginner. Most remain so after years of play. Developing skill is hard work for most people.

Below 1200 is a beginner, unless you are from a country that values chess, such as Ukraine. Then, below 1500 is a beginner.

Avatar of Wins

The OP wrote this two years ago. He is higher rated now at 1441 daily.

Avatar of Ziryab
Defaultedwastaken wrote:

The OP wrote this two years ago. He is higher rated now at 1441 daily.

The OP is 715 rapid. They’ve played four correspondence games—all wins, and all in 2021—to get that 1441 rating. That’s obviously not the rating in question. Only the rapid rating is based on more games than a butcher has fingers.

Avatar of DreamscapeHorizons

If u take all players & average them together 640 might be about average.

Avatar of Bogopawn657

My advice to anyone on ratings and I speak from experience been playing since I was 17 for club and local county- weekend Chess Congress,'s DO NOT PUT TOO MUCH IMPORTANCE ON A RATING, HOW YOUR RATING IS UP OR DOWN?!! when your starting off its not the bees knees of your chess progress whether it's high or on the decline to play this game and play to a creasonable level takes time remember the most famous quotation in chess from the great Emanuelle Lasker who said: CHESS IS AS LIFE, YOU WILL HAVE GOOD DAYS & ALSO BAD DAYS ON THE ROAD TO CHESS ENLIGHTENMENT!!

Avatar of bnamenot

heey

Avatar of zdorovV

играю с подписчиками https://www.twitch.tv/mrzdorov

Avatar of Vrous

Hey

Avatar of MitakaTarikata

Is not too bad

Avatar of GabyNguyen

better than me XD

Avatar of whiteknight1968

Do you enjoy playing?

If the answer is yes then does rating really matter? Its just how the site matches you against someone at a similar level. If you see it as a measure of your ability thats a recipe for discontent.

Avatar of Bombanishisss

I don't really care for attempting to increase my rating, I only care about beating the people I am normally matched up against. If the engine thinks I should play someone 1000 elo above me, I'll still do it. I just want to play chess.

Avatar of Bombanishisss
KnightErrant97 wrote:

Frankly put, this is the sort of rating you’d expect a very young child with no knowledge of the game to have. I’d encourage you to look at any of your games you thought was played well, and turn on the chess analysis engine. At the 700 level, It’ll show you a whole myriad of blunders and mistakes on both sides. (I also use it as a tool for reviewing my own games)

Ouch, look at those downvotes.

Avatar of Geckstachess

What to get better?

Take these free courses on this website!

https://www.chessnotcomplex.com

Avatar of Geckstachess

you can also contact them for customized puzzles!

Your practice is their priority

Avatar of Geckstachess

Check Out this website for totally free chess courses to help you improve

ChessNotComplex.com

Also You can ask for customized puzzles just for you!

Avatar of UnlinkedDaBudir

640 is a decent beginner I've been at that level and it's a little bit bad but not very bad you should set a goal for 700

Avatar of MARattigan

It's about 640.