Those that play the game of abuse the nut really need to be locked up to find out how nasty their being.
It's actually they're, not their.
Those that play the game of abuse the nut really need to be locked up to find out how nasty their being.
It's actually they're, not their.
i 'invented' the bongcloud and beat nigel 11-1 and yet ever since i have had poor ratings-is there a global conspiracy to uncover me as a cheat and am i being observed by the chess authorities, it sounds totally bonkers but these people go to extreme measures to find cheats.
There was this one time I had to hide from the police because I beat stockfish and I was on the FBI top 10 most wanted so very relatable.
Here is your standard games otb record since the ECF rating conversion aggregated by class. Very much in line statistically with the 16xx OTB player you are. you are expected to occasionally get a lucky win against a 2000. You are not ICC Fischer (unless you created that identity...) and did not play Nigel Short, much less beat him.
Note, I'm not woofing, I'm not much better, just calling out a blowhard. Haughty proud virus is indeed all around. but you were a rude arrogant jerk when you lost to me, that much is true, as you well know.
g | w | l | d | pct | perf rating | |||||
unrated / <1200 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0.85 | 1480 | ||||
1200-1399 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.75 | 1500 | ||||
1400-1599 | 43 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 0.64 | 1621 | ||||
1600-1799 | 47 | 12 | 22 | 13 | 0.39 | 1615 | ||||
1800-1999 | 17 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 0.26 | 1712 | ||||
2000-2199 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0.14 | 1809 | ||||
2200-2399 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1800 | ||||
>2400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
TOTALS | 135 | 48 | 52 | 34 | 0.48 | 1631 |
As someone who's been accused of "playing like a 2800" against you, I find this thread ridiculously entertaining
yes frank, anything you say frank
just so people don't think they should actually listen to you in any context:
From Team4545 Game Forum for T87 in Jan '21;
You should learn to quit when you're beaten, "Bobby". Grace would be too much to ask. Once a cheater, maybe not always, but always a clear view to your character.
Hello let me set the scene, In 2001 on the Internet Chess Club, Nigel short played me and thought he was playing Bobby Fischer. In his column in the Telegraph newspaper he declared he had indeed just played Bobby in his third coming after the World famous player, who won the chess match of the century against Boris Spassky, in 1972, came out of self imposed hiding(allegedly). Now I was oblivious to this fact that it was actually me and not Bobby who Nigel had played I will set the scene now and it all makes (a weird) kind of sense. I was an up and coming player in 1996, I had just come second to one John Toothill a 190 grade player from Cumbria in the Cumbria County Individuals and in 1995 I had come third in an under 175 grade tournament in Preston. My grade in 1996 was only 153 but it was going up fast. Then I moved to Manchester to do a Masters degree and my world fell apart. I ended up in hospital, and not for a broken foot. So when I partly recovered and was finally let out of solitary confinement, I decided to join Kasparovs now defunct website online to get a bit of chess practice. On that I quite remarkable achieved a rating of 2350 quickly beating many grandmasters on the way. I continued, with a lack of concentration, to struggle in my otb play and made a ton load of mistakes, also for some strange reason people seemed much stronger now. Anyway it was online that I was proving myself a strong player and after the Kasparov website went defunct in the year 2000 I went to a site my fiancée had found it was called the internet chess club. I soon achieved incredible feats on there beating many grandmasters to a pulp. Anyway I went in my fiancees front room where the computer usually was to play chess online one day and my fiancée had moved the computer into the small kitchen we had and said ‘I’ve arranged for a match for you it was a surprise’. I think in hindsight she had a camera in the kitchen for the event. Apparently the match was with Nigel Short, who had a few years before in 1993 challenged the great Garry Kasparov for the world championship, as was at the time, Britains strongest ever player, almost at his peak. When, early on in the match, I went to play the English opening, I mouse slipped and played 1 f3. Now I was unsure what to do and annoyed with myself and thought I was going to get destroyed on the board so I just marched my king all over the board, making popular the bongcloud opening as totally unknown to me, the games were going to be analyzed infinitum. People would analyze the opening played for hidden strategies in great depth but really I was just making it up after a mouse slip. After I won the game vs Nigel I started to get suspicious, how could a patzer like me beat the great Nigel Short, with 1 f3 and 2 Kf2? Unless he was letting me win. Paranoia took hold, my illness from 1996 re occurred and I set about testing the king march openings to destruction. Rather incredibly I kept winning and won the Match something like 11-1. I was getting so paranoid asking why was he letting me win at this stage and finally I played the opening 1 f4 d5 2 f5 e5 3 g4?? Qh4#. I did so deliberately to prove he wasn’t letting me win. After a few games the person who was using a handle(a handle is an assumed phrase on online sites) called Ural, who my fiancée said was Nigel’s incognito handle, he mentioned a name of what I then thought was his actual name(Armando Acevedo I think it was), later I was to discover it was actually the name of a Mexican opponent to Bobby at the Siegen Olympiad in 1970 but when I mentioned it was a Mexican name, my fiancée said ‘quick give me the keyboard I know that name’ and she wrote Siegen 1970. Unknown to me she had memorized Fischers opponnents it seemed. But I just thought the Mexican name was my opponent I was playing. Anyway my fiancée said he ‘thinks your bobby’, and when Nigel continued with the statement ‘Who is the greatest player you have played in blitz?’ I didn’t think it was Nigel but the words of my fiancée came to mind, that the person thought I was bobby and I had just read ‘the life and games of Tal’ in which it stated Bobby was most afraid of Tal in blitz, so I quipped back ‘if I am who you think I am I would say Tal’ Anyway my fiancée a few days later told me about Nigel Short had gone public but I was away with the fairies and convinced that I couldn’t beat Nigel Short 11-1 so it must have been that Mexican guy (Acevedo) not Nigel I played. I forgot about the whole incident. I ended up in hospital in 2003 and didn’t come out until 2007. I found otb very difficult to concentrate on and did poorly, my rating going down to 93 at one stage that is about 1380 elo. Anyway I completely forgot about everything that had happened until in 2020 I was searching online for a Bobby Fischer video of any sort, and I came across a video of an event between Bobby Fischer and Nigel Short. Intrigued, I watched it and nearly fell off my chair when they said the handles used by bobby were guest71 and guest2563 both of which I remembered setting up. At the time I set up the handles I was told I was going to be given ordinary guest accounts but I refused and stated I wanted meaningful handles so a compromise was suggested that I make them look like guest accounts which had guest and a number but the number I choose meant something to me, guest71 and guest2563 had a meaning to me which I knew and remembered setting them up and when in the video the same handles were mentioned I thought hey up THAT’S ME. Every piece of incidental detail tallied but they stated in the video they thought the person used a computer engine. Indeed it had become an urban myth about Bobby playing Nigel completely unbeknown to me and the conclusion was it was a hoax. Many videos and articles had emerged on various theories, that I had used multiple engines, that I was the real Bobby Fischer, all were dismissed or promoted and I set about trying to put the record straight. I didn’t use an engine the engines available were very wooden and unstrategical, at the time. Plus the three minute time frame was recognized as putting impossible limits on computer assistance at the time before such things as computer cheat plug ins were invented. Deep blue was available but at a cost of operation of 1 million pounds a second the cray computer used in it would have been very costly. No in 2001 I was in the groove online and playing sublime stuff.
this is all cap bro no way
I have beaten other grandmasters around 2012 i beat gm keith arkell he will confirm it it was a 15 0 blitz game online
I love fhunfi, he's a strong player, but he's 1750 on ICC, not 2000, and your record against him in the last 90 days (as AlWynJones) is 1 win, 5 losses and 1 draw. As I've said, even a class player can have a lucky day. Against a 1750, 1-5-1 gives you a performance rating of 1521, which seems about right. Great job cherry-picking the one win as your exemplar. That's what someone interested in the truth would do, I guess.
I know how deeply fhunfi works on his openings and how dedicated he is as a coach, but, just sayin' - someone with a darker heart would be interested in how a 1500 (with a self-admitted checkered history of Computer use) played 21 moves of theory perfectly, then capitalized on a tactical mistake expertly, using almost no time, but it's not my place to judge At least you showed up for the game, lol.
its not what it appears why cant you even consider that
I consider everything I hear - even the nonsense you spout. That's how I learn things. But, after researching it, Occam prevents me from taking you seriously. You are a class player. Always have been. It's ok - there's lots of us here. You may have a win or two against a titled player (probably quick time controls, no increment), but you did not play or beat Nigel Short.
It seems reality has no place in your world, which is just too bad - honest self-reflection is the only path to being a better person - a path that is, apparently, closed to you...
@realgojira for a start i have played two matches against fhunfi and lost the 11 game first match only 4.5-6.5 and am 1.5-2.5 down in the second. then the fact that fhunfi is 1750 on icc is testement to the underated nature of theyre ratings, fhunfi is 2000 in indonesianian national rating and if you notice i am 1500 on icc when i am 1680 fide and 1656 elo in the english national ratings
@realgojira as for the insinuation i am a cheat i have never ever used a computer assistant unless my opponent wanted to play a computer and insisted that i use a computer which isnt in any sane person eyes cheating.
@realgojira as for the insinuation i am a cheat i have never ever used a computer assistant unless my opponent wanted to play a computer and insisted that i use a computer which isnt in any sane person eyes cheating.
I used the games available in ICC history for my analysis. No reason to take your word for anything else. If fhunfi provides game histories, I can update numbers accordingly.
According to ICC's very first note on computer usage:
"Anyone using a chess-related program while playing on the ICC must be listed on the computer list"
There are no exceptions. So, you admitted to using a computer on ICC, therefore, as I correctly noted, you are a self-admitted cheat, in general. As to any specific insinuation that you read into my note, I said nothing and accused you of nothing. Appears your conscience is getting the best of you. For once.
@realgojira as for the insinuation i am a cheat i have never ever used a computer assistant unless my opponent wanted to play a computer and insisted that i use a computer which isnt in any sane person eyes cheating.
I used the games available in ICC history for my analysis. No reason to take your word for anything else. If fhunfi provides game histories, I can update numbers accordingly.
According to ICC's very first note on computer usage:
"Anyone using a chess-related program while playing on the ICC must be listed on the computer list"
There are no exceptions. So, you admitted to using a computer on ICC, therefore, as I correctly noted, you are a self-admitted cheat, in general. As to any specific insinuation that you read into my note, I said nothing and accused you of nothing. Appears your conscience is getting the best of you. For once.
what a load of horse manure
If cap78red has million fans i am one of them . if cap78red has ten fans i am one of them. if cap78red has one fan that is me. if cap78red has no fans, that means i am no more on the earth. if world is against cap78red i am against the world
I am not a kgb nut trying to make a fool of Nigel Short, or cia for that matter relaying bobbies games. I realize its embarrassing to Nigel this business but try and see it from my point of view although it is hard to work out what that is from whats happened. Just think what if i am a natural talent being suppressed by mysterious and dark forces. Thats what i insist is happening.
If you were psychotic back then, how are you sure you're not psychotic now, about this? Regardless, I don't think the internet is the best place for a person who has trouble separating fantasy from reality. Perhaps try gardening or farming instead of just focusing on tech.