Hmmm perhaps lel
Update in Stats Page
Sort:
ok
I was getting like this, but now it is back to normal.
Aug 25, 2021
0
#7
I like it, but what is my rating compared to when I have the timeframe set to "All time"?
For example my current Blitz rating is 777, with a -242 under it.
According to this I started playing rated 1019, which is not true since I started with the default starting rating of 1200.
Aug 25, 2021
0
#8
Marquee_K wrote:
I like it, but what is my rating compared to when I have the timeframe set to "All time"?
For example my current Blitz rating is 777, with a -242 under it.
According to this I started playing rated 1019, which is not true since I started with the default starting rating of 1200.
I think you play a few games that heavily affect your rating before it decides your first rating
Aug 25, 2021
0
#9
ThatGuyNamedJeff wrote:
Marquee_K wrote:
I like it, but what is my rating compared to when I have the timeframe set to "All time"?
For example my current Blitz rating is 777, with a -242 under it.
According to this I started playing rated 1019, which is not true since I started with the default starting rating of 1200.
I think you play a few games that heavily affect your rating before it decides your first rating
Interesting. So I guess there's a provisional rating for comparison purposes but not for the "Highest Rating" statistic (which for me is 1200 because I can never reach that point again).
Nice update, it also shows your overall accuracy as well as a percentage breakdown of how you win, lose (resignation, checkmate, timeout) and draw (agreement, threefold repetition and stalemate). Just curious why this wasn't announced in a month in review article for July, which hasn't come out yet and the month is almost over?
Aug 26, 2021
0
#11
AceFrawley wrote:
Nice update, it also shows your overall accuracy as well as a percentage breakdown of how you win, lose (resignation, checkmate, timeout) and draw (agreement, threefold repetition and stalemate). Just curious why this wasn't announced in a month in review article for July, which hasn't come out yet and the month is almost over?
I don't think it's fully released. It's been in beta for a while and the site will often roll out features to a subset of non-beta members as well, to solicit additional feedback.
Should I give a feedback then? How should I?
If Chesscom takes feedback in Forum Posts:
It's nice and faster and easier however, the default is put to "All time" and I would prefer it to 30 days, but it's overall a very creative idea and I liked it.
yes thats a nice update
Aug 26, 2021
0
#14
yKhurana wrote:
Should I give a feedback then? How should I?
If Chesscom takes feedback in Forum Posts:
It's nice and faster and easier however, the default is put to "All time" and I would prefer it to 30 days, but it's overall a very creative idea and I liked it.
There's a Feedback forum category, you can use Help > Make a Suggestion, or open a ticket with support.
Aug 26, 2021
0
#15
AceFrawley wrote:
Nice update, it also shows your overall accuracy ...
One thing to note, it shows the overall accuracy of all games you have reports ran on.
Another update to the stats page, I like the look of it, although I would prefer if it didn't have an icon there for 960 as I haven't played any games of that variant so there are no stats for me to see on that one.
Also, it doesn't appear on my home screen, which is good.
I cannot find the average move time anymore. Has it been moved to somewhere, or removed altogether?
Chesscom has updated the Stats Layout, its much better now and faster.