He said i was a bad opponent and that i was a stupid chess player but i do not care.
What a clown opponent
Sort:
MatrixInhabitant escribió:
yes i get offended by that. its disrespectful to strong players. sorry that you dont belong to them...
If you get offended by that it just shows that you are a mental midget. You a strong player? Pff, you are just a sad clown.
you talking to me aussie rookie?if yes i have played him\her
#12 and #13
6. h3 in a Ruy Lopez at these grades ??
9. Nxe5 --- The white squared bishop is so important in this opening for white you do not really want to lose it. Is there a move like Bd5 which is so often used as a means of defending e4 in other RL variations ....
At move 15. It is staring white in the face that black has two ways of pressing g2.
At move 17. (blitz?) well d5, Nf4 or solid Qd2.
At move 21. if you are about to be burned 2 pawns down then lose one of the doubled ones, use the one thing you have the open e-file and see to it your rook is on it.
++++
28. Rd4 --- white can still grab a pawn, still have blunder back rank mate. Play on.
+++
Okay by 38. It is a matter of technique. However black decided not to show it.
The same on move 43.
In end games you push passed pawns.
You were both as bad as each other, white should have resigned but black should have shown winning technique.
pashak you are 1300 rated i am 2000 rated with 0 losses. who are you kidding, yourself?
Aussie Rookie i was playing another type of opponent.
MatrixInhabitant escribió:
pashak you are 1300 rated i am 2000 rated with 0 losses. who are you kidding, yourself?
So what? Am I supposed to be impressed or something?
yes you are supposed to bow down to me and stop trash talking. i would checkmate you in 5 moves if we would play .
Keep dreaming kid
Mar 18, 2017
0
#34
New accounts with few games, no losses, and troll posts are suspicious.
micky1943 wrote:
There's always something a bit off about the kind of person who post games for the sole purpose of mocking their opponents. Why would you do that? Bad genetics? Bad upbringing? Who knows? But it's a little ugly
Yeah. I go with the default, provide a little insight for the losing player rather than praising the winner for an "immortal"
i didnt post to mock my opponent though, i want to express how ridiculous i find his action of not surrendering when i am up 6 pawns with time advantage on the clock and can promote to any piece i want.
he played on with the clear purpose of wasting my time.
I'd do it too if I would get the same reaction out of you.
Mar 18, 2017
0
#39
Yeah, certainly after move 30 it was rude to keep playing as a 1900, and could have resigned almost 10 moves earlier with a clear conscience.
yes i get offended by that. its disrespectful to strong players. sorry that you dont belong to them...