Other mechanisms have been proposed (see first-come-first-served-team-chess) and some are apparently being considered.
2 questions not answerd by chess.com


...
Erik wrote: "this is a forum topic for people to throw out ideas. it isn't my project management platform, and it isn't a democratic referendum on the future of chess.com. i know that your life feels incomplete without me diverting countless hours on perfectly formatting each and every suggestion made on this forum and that i am a horrible website manager for not delivering said report to you on time... but i'm not going to do it. i read each and every post made in this forum, and i absorb the good ones, ignore the ones we can't or won't do, and keep my own list, which i may or may not share as i deem it appropriate. i'm too focused on important things to waste my time on unimportant things. get over it."

Clamo, clamatis, omnes clamamus pro glace lactis.
empujamadera wrote: Orange sherbet for me
That's a sorbet, surely?

Clamo, clamatis, omnes clamamus pro glace lactis.
empujamadera wrote: Orange sherbet for me
That's a sorbet, surely?
Yup, but then you gotta eat it with a smaller spoon

The loading circle isn't spinning counter-clockwise, it's spinning clockwise so fast that an optical illusion is created.

Thanks artfizz....That is why I am for that there is a list of all suggestions and short comment next to it(question number E.)...Much easier for everyone and peopele wouldnt ask same questions again and again and never get answers even if their suggestions are read before.
I got lucky because (police sketch) kohai read my post and said that my questions will be answered....but most of them are not even if they are read...
Really looking forward toread answers ;)

There used to be a series of Wishlists in which people would suggest features they felt chess.com was lacking. These topics tended to reach 1000 posts or so, with many repetitions (from people who had not read all preceding posts). At this point, a new Wishlist would be initiated. Periodically, there were attempts to structure, summarise or categorize - but to little effect.
Eventually, these wishlists were superseded by a new forum category: Site Feedback & Suggestions. This category currently contains nearly 2,500 posts - including, no doubt, many repetitions.
As Erik's response (cited in a previous post) indicates, chess.com staff have higher priority tasks than maintaining a feature log - and no-one else has the necessary information.
Even if kohai answers all of your questions, her answers are not likely to be substantially different from those given by anyone else who regularly reads the forums.
"Questions are a burden to others; answers are a prison for oneself."

I am aware of those wishlists(I posted in them).
New wish list should look like this:
forum post rating-maybe
customised trophys-never
polls-allready got them; maybe change them
.....
and stick this topic so everyone can know what is allready discussed . I think that some of moderators can monitor this and update lists(maybe even post links for every suggestion)...Chess.com needs little improvement in publis relations ;)
Why I ask so many questions:
One who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; one who does not ask a question remains a fool forever.
This idea has been floated a few times, in these threads (and the wishlists):
what-to-expect-from-chesscom-forums
daily-puzzle-comments2
site-trophies-and-top-blogging
rewarding-points
voting-posts-up-and-down
forum-comment-rating
The prime candidate is Loomis' thumbs up/thumbs down rating (similar to digg.com).
One of the main issues is that there is no mechanism to reference individual posts.