Sillver1 wrote:
king, i think youll like this book.. its written by gary keller, the owner of keller williams
If I had 10 cents for every book that promised to make me a millionaire...
Just kidding - looks a nice book.
Does True Randomness Actually Exist? ( ^&*#^%$&#% )
Sort:
gary keller has more than 100,000 independent people working under his brand name KW, and his one thing is to keep them educated and motivated. i think hes good at it because they generate sales of over $250B's yearly.
but somthin just crossed my mind.. you made hundreds of posts on this topic, and not even a single one of them is about True Randomness. kinda odd wont you say? maybe its the right time..
HiHo ? lets hava cyberdonut 
. I wanna walmart maple bar stuffed creamy thingy. howbout u ?
Jun 19, 2020
0
#2626
I challenge anyone to predict Ghostess' next post. If it proves utterly impossible, we have the answer to the title question. 
Jun 19, 2020
0
#2627
Sillver1 wrote:
but somthin just crossed my mind.. you made hundreds of posts on this topic, and not even a single one of them is about True Randomness.
It is your failing, not mine, to have forgotten the ones discussing what would be a definition of "true randomness", arriving at a definition and then reasoning that definition is satisfied by certain phenomena, based on key, empirically verified physics.
kinda odd wont you say? maybe its the right time.
No, that time is way back in this discussion.
I thought that once you understood determinism in the context of this topic along with the quote bellow, everything will fall together for you. guess i was wrong.
"and if random is just an illusion, does it mean that every game of chess is already determined before it even start?"
maybe mustang will be kind and explain this to you. i dont have the sort of patience it takes right now
my cyberdonut is bogota colombia.. almost there, im counting on your spells : )
Jun 19, 2020
0
#2631
Sillver1 wrote:
I thought that once you understood determinism in the context of this topic along with the quote bellow, everything will fall together for you. guess i was wrong.
Objectively, I understand everything relevant to this subject better than you. Your opinion of yourself is however unsurpassed.
"and if random[ness] is just an illusion, does it mean that every game of chess is already determined before it even start?"
You would have to be brain dead not to realise by now I firmly conclude the first clause is false. Thus this sentence is a question about the consequences of a falsehood. While the answer is trivial, this makes it insignificant.
maybe mustang will be kind and explain this to you. i dont have the sort of patience it takes right now
Lack of patience, ability, understanding, experience, knowledge, and also excessive ego - there are so many reasons why your comments are random and disjointed, such as talking about explaining a trivial consequence of a false pretext.
Yeah, well, if you scratched out your egocentric oddity things would run smoother.
Jun 19, 2020
0
#2633
Sillver1 wrote:
gary keller has more than 100,000 independent people working under his brand name KW, and his one thing is to keep them educated and motivated. i think hes good at it because they generate sales of over $250B's yearly.
He is a good businessman and (IMO) a good writer with bold, interesting ideas.
.....and there are p l e n t y posts here totally random showing how completely ridiculous this debate whether it exists.
There are two types of knowledge and one is wise, and that’s nothing to do with the worldly.
jumphrope wrote:
Well that was random ;)
😂
"elroch:"You would have to be brain dead not to realise by now"
lovely projection..
elroch:"I firmly conclude the first clause is false"
your conclusion is based on your own definition.. thats a silly fallacy. and if anyone took a close look at your definition, they will clearly see that you dont define TR, you exclude it, and replace it with randomness that is knowledge based.. silly.
Is there ever
a right time