Lost_rainclouds wrote:
Thing I'm good at...
Sort:
Nov 15, 2021
0
#44
I'm gud at singing, and doing bad things xd I'm also gud at playing games
Jeon_Jasphine wrote:
babyyoda33 wrote:
im rly good at stuff
ya ik very vague
but idk what im good at
maybe some mental stuff? idk
Ooooo mental stuff?? like wat??
um idk just being mentally strong and all that stuff
babyyoda33 wrote:
Jeon_Jasphine wrote:
babyyoda33 wrote:
im rly good at stuff
ya ik very vague
but idk what im good at
maybe some mental stuff? idk
Ooooo mental stuff?? like wat??
um idk just being mentally strong and all that stuff
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
Extremely good at being annoying..
prove it =)
Nov 15, 2021
0
#49
ron10023 wrote:
babyyoda33 wrote:
Jeon_Jasphine wrote:
babyyoda33 wrote:
im rly good at stuff
ya ik very vague
but idk what im good at
maybe some mental stuff? idk
Ooooo mental stuff?? like wat??
um idk just being mentally strong and all that stuff
Loll that egg
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
ron10023 wrote:
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
Extremely good at being annoying..
prove it =)
I won't, are you my dad that I should listen to you ?
Nov 15, 2021
0
#51
A-ARUSH wrote:
I am good at drawing,chess and science
Can you state the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
rmc123456 wrote:
A-ARUSH wrote:
I am good at drawing,chess and science
Can you state the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
The second law of thermodynamics states that any spontaneously occurring process will always lead to an escalation in the entropy (S) of the universe. In simple words, the law explains that an isolated system’s entropy will never decrease over time.
Very good!! =)
Now state the 20 impossible to theoretically verify numbers..but are experimentally correct that govern quantum mechanics =)
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
ron10023 wrote:
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
ron10023 wrote:
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
rmc123456 wrote:
A-ARUSH wrote:
I am good at drawing,chess and science
Can you state the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
The second law of thermodynamics states that any spontaneously occurring process will always lead to an escalation in the entropy (S) of the universe. In simple words, the law explains that an isolated system’s entropy will never decrease over time.
Very good!! =)
Now state the 20 impossible to theoretically verify numbers..but are experimentally correct that govern quantum mechanics =)
Nov 15, 2021
0
#56
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
rmc123456 wrote:
A-ARUSH wrote:
I am good at drawing,chess and science
Can you state the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
The second law of thermodynamics states that any spontaneously occurring process will always lead to an escalation in the entropy (S) of the universe. In simple words, the law explains that an isolated system’s entropy will never decrease over time.
Pretty good.
Nov 15, 2021
0
#57
ron10023 wrote:
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
rmc123456 wrote:
A-ARUSH wrote:
I am good at drawing,chess and science
Can you state the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
The second law of thermodynamics states that any spontaneously occurring process will always lead to an escalation in the entropy (S) of the universe. In simple words, the law explains that an isolated system’s entropy will never decrease over time.
Very good!! =)
Now state the 20 impossible to theoretically verify numbers..but are experimentally correct that govern quantum mechanics =)
This I don't know.
well impossible until lots of quantum mechanics situations are found out... will be atleast 150 years before theoretically verified =)
Nov 15, 2021
0
#59
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
rmc123456 wrote:
ron10023 wrote:
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
rmc123456 wrote:
A-ARUSH wrote:
I am good at drawing,chess and science
Can you state the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
The second law of thermodynamics states that any spontaneously occurring process will always lead to an escalation in the entropy (S) of the universe. In simple words, the law explains that an isolated system’s entropy will never decrease over time.
Very good!! =)
Now state the 20 impossible to theoretically verify numbers..but are experimentally correct that govern quantum mechanics =)
This I don't know.
"impossible to theoretically verify"
I was a philosopher/logician in my professional life, but was never better than mediocre as a scientist at school. With this in mind, I have a question which may well be the product of my ignorance, viz:-
Doesn't verification proceed from experiment and induction in the first place? I'm not at all sure that I understand the notion of verifying a hypothesis by means of its role in a theory.
rmc123456 wrote:
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
rmc123456 wrote:
ron10023 wrote:
Eros_Jasphine wrote:
rmc123456 wrote:
A-ARUSH wrote:
I am good at drawing,chess and science
Can you state the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
The second law of thermodynamics states that any spontaneously occurring process will always lead to an escalation in the entropy (S) of the universe. In simple words, the law explains that an isolated system’s entropy will never decrease over time.
Very good!! =)
Now state the 20 impossible to theoretically verify numbers..but are experimentally correct that govern quantum mechanics =)
This I don't know.
"impossible to theoretically verify"
I was a philosopher/logician in my professional life, but was never better than mediocre as a scientist at school. With this in mind, I have a question which may well be the product of my ignorance, viz:-
Doesn't verification proceed from experiment and induction in the first place? I'm not at all sure that I understand the notion of verifying a hypothesis by means of its role in a theory.
wel..normally these are theoretically shown or proved and then experimentally
experimentally costs billions, theoretically, costs the price of paper
they wanna have a verification before spending billions to prove something
so firstly theoretical proof is given, then experimental
in case of these 20 numbers, nobody knows exactly why the values are what they are...all they know is those number values come from experiments, but no theoretical proof is there yet to find the numbers to an incredibly precise value =)
ok ?